Panacea or product "P"

[Константин.]

Any of these methods, suitable equivalent.

[Андрей С.]

Read the trilogy "Urbi et orbi, or the city and the world" G. L. OLDI. I'm serious. (Well, better and "Oikoumene" by the same author to read, but, I think, not sure).

I strongly suspect that a detailed step-by-step instructions for programming there is no Panacea, not only because you need to learn, but also because each is a very individual process. Yes, I create a program in a particular state close to 3.0. About this, what in the mentioned above book is called "the failure of the husk". But even if I describe their shape, you will get nothing from it because you should have your own. Anyway what I will say, for example "flowers" — create an image for this word; I think it will be very different from mine.

Visualization? Not sure what you mean by this word. Try.

There is still a "Explorer experience" has not been canceled

[Алекс С]

Constantinethank you that answered!

From Your answer I understand you can still give to the mission == the ultimate goal, in the form of oral or nutritiology of wording and that it is better, in the form of positive visualizations. It is desirable to fasten 3.0 to improve the result.

Guess maybe it did (using the formulation in the presence of 3.0) did Practices and ufo:
http://openmagic.org/ph/showthread.php?p=16262

If you dig in OM and MM, it clearly shows that the program P is not honored, feedback on modules and products two orders of magnitude greater.
This is despite the fact that the programming panacea - is essentially the creation of a new artifact, such as on the basis of the truck you can make a milk - like limited opportunities, and actually got a new device.

So a couple of explanations, or even manual, could have done more in this direction.
And programs with the GPL would be a bit more...

In the meantime, to solve a narrow task, the more the forum is used a stabilizer or modules bracelets, as well as "forced" desire in the UK. That's great, but I would like to have an additional degree of freedom.

So I decided to ask a specific algorithm, for example, couples already raised in the forums so:
1. How to program a panacea to be applied to the bed that they contributed to OS/WTO.
2. How to program a panacea to be applied to the refrigerator, so they improved the positive properties of food.

Remember the story of how Michael made the copier with the help of two came to hand plastic circles and U-labels:
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=4136&start=75
There is still voffka asked about the details of the algorithm. Most interesting, he was more interested in algorithms mechanical than mental.
That's me as a person not in the subject, of which the majority here, it would be important to know what such a mental to do after sticking stickers or drawing matrices, for example to make a similar copier.

Generally, of course, programming I in full neponyatkah.
On the one hand P-thumb drive is a mass commercial product which is available in programming for all.
On the other, we remember the words of Michael,"the flash drive is an effective way of storing algorithms, and-or energy States, structures, and so-forth that are available to You at least to some extent"as well as multiple words of Michael about the fact that "Mentally possible to program something that will be able to "catch" somehow".

Sabandthanks for the links on books. Of course, will read this will not. But the algorithm would not stop, I need to know where to start. Because in 1.0 there is a clear algorithm, and 3.0 N, and СК1М and on the stabilizer (especially!!!) and retreat is not recommended, because the quality of most of the users below and significantly below the level of the intuitive creation of these artifacts.<

[арте:м]

Alexperhaps a large number of listed issues will be charged to the long-awaited release of the programmer for Panacea. I haven't heard about it, but ever Post of Russia (tm) will obviously deliver all the necessary components and the release will be..

[Андрей С.]

A clear algorithm has to create 1.0, 3.0 N, etc., not using. The stabilizer is clear algorithms use, but the stabilizer — not BJ.

All the questions you ask, and many others for a very long time revolved in my head. But I knew that if Michael is not laid out step-by-step instructions for programming a Panacea, it has its own reasons. In the end, all the available information (and it is really enough, especially considering the recent posts of Michael in this thread) one way or another has been treated consciously or subconsciously, and I just decided to try to do it, and in the process started to come to understand, and then, as you saw, came and validation of understanding from Michael

You may have read on OpenMagic in the topic "External questions" about the practice with clouds. The point is that cloud dissolves mental effort, so to speak. What good is this practice, in my opinion — it is easy to feel the desired state editing world. If someone asked me to describe how I do it, my answer would be something like: "Enter the state of 3.0 and dissolve the cloud." All. I don't visualize that it dissolves, I do not give any language, I just do it. And there is no step-by-step instructions, no algorithm, because it is still how to write an algorithm for arm movement at the level of "send from this part of the brain an electrical signal through the nerve fibers to the biceps muscle to cause contraction of the fibers of muscles..." the algorithm will be more harmful than helpful.

Next. I think if you just apply the matrix on the bed and give a verbal formulation, the effect will be, but weak. And it's not a programming Panacea in that vein, we're talking about here. To create a program, you need to have an idea about the processes that need to happen, and Express it in a certain system of images. If you don't understand internally what you have to do Panacea and her TO, then what algorithm will it work?

Well, I guess you're wrong with regards to what programming Panacea not held in high esteem For example, I personally stand in the public well, not more than 10% of your thoughts, ideas and results. And many, many users BJ-technologies are generally not registered on the forums.

update.

For example, the same program for food. Michael AF program includes, among other things, self-study and work with the consciousness of the operator(s). To me this level is not yet available, I don't understand on any level how this should happen. My program only interacts directly with the food and only slightly with the operator in the sense that there is a dependence on diet of the operator to alert that object undesirable for use in food <

[bofara]

self-study and work with the consciousness of the operator(s)

I think that both conditions /independent study and work with the consciousness of the operator(s) must be entered for example in the "minds" of cells as with 'their view'/:
1. The self-study. In my opinion, should be presented exactly what we want to do cells and this condition can be translyvania, most often in the form of our feelings /situations images/ - for example, "this is good, this is bad" is very exaggerated/.
2. To work with the consciousness of the operator - impersonating a person /for instance like buys or receives a gift or just thinking of something from the library Panacea - for example, "Stream Hot" or "Food from Saband '/ and to this man the feeling that he was "boss". Etc.

If wrong, I hope Michael and the other forum corrected.

[Константин.]

For programming "P" do not have to login to 3.0. Panacea perfectly programmable sitting in a chair, and even better walking:) ...ahead of time for some:)
Yeah, go on foot, and in motion program as imagination allows. child ask such a task, he will not have how, of course its! what else!?? and then on the program:)
So, once again, for a walk, preferably in the woods, and there the head to let go, and rushed. and how it will look verbally, figuratively, or even as the case is in General not important.

[Gelios]

As mnogabukaf
Mentally she is programmed: off panacea, ask what you need and everything. If you want to be perverted with the cure, it is the understanding of what I want to do a principle, it somehow was seen as a way to this thing and ask. And look what happened.
Or there is another perversion: write what you need to on a piece of paper and look through it as through a window - just the same way as perceived. You can try to evaluate its effectiveness and change to maximize efficiency or harmony or softness of the action, the image will change.
Better in my opinion without algorithms to work: took and switched, took and reprogrammed. After the habit of working techniques with algorithms is how to dance to removing the plaster off his feet and throwing the crutches...a little familiar.
But once swarnavahini, do not ask, better to start trying that easier and it is easier to check quickly. Anyway feedback is desirable, ie the ability to perceive the result.
But why torture her, she is a valuable basic functionality.

[Алекс С]

Thank you all for responding to my message.

If you do not mind, I will continue.

First metaphor.
Here is wanted man bracelet 3.0 to 3.0 to.
This person takes a sheet of paper, cut a strip, writes a matrix of 1.0 L, and after 10 minutes the matrix 3.0 L
A stripe of glue to the bracelet.
Did the people of this bracelet 3.0? Undoubtedly, for the technology are observed.
If he did the maximum in order to most successfully log in as 3.0.
Of course not.
And here begins the algorithmic refinements and complications, namely:
- use black wood
to use the system instead of 3.0 N 3.0 L
- the use of high-quality printing of mandalas.
- the use of petapixel with direct contact to the links instead of the speaker membrane at a distance.
- Addition of bismuth and possibly of shungite.
- Use TV ants, and maybe even turntables Rinat.
- perhaps the use of epoxy
- it is possible to apply the matrix L to charge mandalas N
...
...

Well, I think the metaphor is clear.
I am fully confident, and Constantine this confirms that programming of the Panacea can and stateless 3.0 and without visualization and without special skills. Only one formulation, oral, vnutridiskovoe or even written and that will be enough to "programming took place."
But the effectiveness of such programming will be a few below, in comparison with more sophisticated algorithm (or am I wrong? No, I think that's right, no wonder that Constantine invited into the forest and head to let go... )

So, what should be done to the programming turned out better:
1. To put on a few bracelets 3.0 N even if they do not feel.
2. To put the matrix P on the object, wait (how long?) and looking at these matrixes say: "disable mode "panacea" in the data matrices in this object and include the mode of creation of conditions favourable programming."
3. Actually, the programming, about which I know nothing.

This is where my knowledge ends.

Dear Gelios, Constantine., Saband.
Could you for example some still show this is the "self programming". After all, this is not one item.

Rather, yet, for lack of another, that one point - wording the ultimate goali.e. I put the matrix on the object and say:
"The matrix is a Panacea, load up the bed so that it is contributed to the occurrence of OS in those who sleep on it"
"The matrix is a Panacea, charge the pan so that the food stored in it become more useful and tastier"
"The matrix is a Panacea, give this a gas stove so that the food prepared on it as efficiently and successfully"
...

And formulation and methods require improvement.
For this I came into this topic.

Well, let's start from afar. Like on the forums I heard about some routewhich is useful when programming panacea.
Does anyone know what it is about in a practical way?<

[Константин.]

All your wording fit.

[Михаил_]

Alex - Constantine quite right for programming (and full efficiency) of panacea, you do not need any special conditions. At all.
3.0 is a state change in the world outside. Side view. In the as 3.0 there was no need to program TO panacea (3.0 have their own methods and TO work with it very specific.

But Yes, the most effective programming possible with the proper perception of the processes and phenomena in all their essence.
It's not "imaginative" programming in the sense of kartingo fantasy, and the transfer of the right set of algorithms and interconnections of the cells based on the ability to explore them.
But it really is just really similar with the described condition of OLDI.
Phrasal, pictorial-shape and a different wording will work as a program, but indirectly.
Ie the base TO panacea will try to find solution for the given problem (in words or formulas specified).
The mistake is to assume that the verbal formulation thereof replaced by substituted to thinking "myself". Just real programming is a very different process. Different.
Associated with the altered state of consciousness.
The simplest operation to generally make do "on the go" or in between.
And many operators desired state is simply one in which they constantly live.
The mistake is to think that programming is held in high esteem.
P-flash and clean panacea (for experienced operators this is essentially the same thing) is one of the most popular products.
Just those who buys them, will not write reviews.
Yes, there is feedback on modules is essentially the "rave" reviews beginners.
The establishment of good programs to cure many associated with purely personal activities that are not subject to any announcement, and at the same time, are everyday business.
Not all events are reflected on the forum.
Much remains behind the scenes and it will.
And this "behind the scenes" is open to all, but steps to restore their abilities sometimes wrongly are perceived as too difficult or impossible.
But it's not my problem.

Panacea is an operating system on the cells, which facilitates the development of programs (for development would be sufficient with a single cell carrier-the power to program it, but would have had to do many things from scratch, but why bother when there are plenty of exhaust techniques, for example, the authorization module operator I all products use one.)

And finally, as has already rightly observed, should not be confused with technology startup creation process (charging 1.0, 3.0 or charging there is a production SK) with programming. It generally processes the different planes.
All the processes of creating these things occur behind the scenes and the actions of printouts of mandalas, body wraps, etc - so.... It is possible in principle and in General to remove them, but only the easier this will be.
What is happening in the background processes are not visible to the eye.
The creation of the IC creates a certain structure, building it on the floors. The elements of the manufacturing process can be compared to a call of a brigade of professionals, at each new stage.
And full programming TO is actually the work of a team from the inside.
Language and text it is impossible to describe, as rightly noted above.
In many of our products are specially made simplified interfaces for submission verbal formulations (SK, W2, Y4, and so on), but even in this case, it really communicates the device program with the complete thought behind written on a piece of paper with the phrase.<

[Алекс С]

Michael Thank you for the detailed response, if you do not understand the subject, ask more dovepress after 3 months...

[Константин.]

Wear the pendant "P" three quarters of the year without removing. Bright impressions from it ended about the time when he wrote of the extreme opinion in this thread. That is a long time

Today, I very clearly realized that I need to change dramatically! I want need serious changes to my personality.
What and how are not yet aware of. I will say this: it's one thing to hear about, to read, to think. And the situation is completely different from the inside suddenly realize that you need quick and serious changes! That will seriously change me as a person.
In what way is not known, but the realization is very bright and extraordinary.
For me this is again a breakthrough, because or anything like that I did not want before.
And those changes that occur throughout life do not compare with these new ones, about which I write above.

[bofara]

I generally Heterosexual-a person /s prevailing Heterosexual quality, psychologically simple language - choleric, but it is, of course, as concepts are not the same completely normal. And regular more than want to "change", always I something I strive for, or change ourselves.

During these periods of change that repeat, I found I needed to really set a specific goal - a strong desire to keep it and keep working at it - keep it up! Otherwise, the initial impetus for change can be very strong but sooner or later breaks down into its compounds..
I like the combination of a strong desire-goal + BJ ---> its implementation is very fast /and oddly enough it was then, I always play intuitively on a small clay Ocarina - Michael wrote that sometimes uses one special, and I really wanted to purchase their own. Apparently when I suddenly want to play, and it occurs not very often - then, and attunement with the World arises /something like a flute with the Regina - a work of 'oecumene', the authors OLDI/.
The focus must stay on specific goals /tasks/. Me in this regard, the Stabilizer helps me only using Stabilizer I had to stop drinking coffee in General, while other attempts gave up and started again..

[Андрей С.]

flute from Regina - a work of 'oecumene', the authors OLDI

Not, "Oykumena" it's about Luciano Borgotta, and about Regina's "the city and the world"

I had to stop drinking coffee in General, while other attempts gave up and started again..

If I had to throw the pizza to eat it, it would be me rawfoodist

[максвп]

Good day to all and good weekend

Two months reading the forums, MM and OM the same wear 2 bracelets 1.0. but a week ago I realized that I desperately needed a bracelet a panacea, but can not find a description of the charging system type 1.0 or 3.0 N. Michael as it was stipulated that supposedly lay out something like this...

Yet abanazer letter matrices my apartment and Studio (the working place).

[Акела]

good day to All and good weekend

Two months reading the forums, MM and OM the same wear 2 bracelets 1.0. but a week ago I realized that I desperately needed a bracelet a panacea, but can not find a description of the charging system type 1.0 or 3.0 N. Michael as it was stipulated that supposedly lay out something like this...

Yet abanazer letter matrices my apartment and Studio (the working place).

BJ 3.0viewtopic.php?f=32&t=3842&start=75

[оуаакун]

good day to All and good weekend

Two months reading the forums, MM and OM the same wear 2 bracelets 1.0. but a week ago I realized that I desperately needed a bracelet a panacea, but can not find a description of the charging system type 1.0 or 3.0 N. Michael as it was stipulated that supposedly lay out something like this...

Yet abanazer letter matrices my apartment and Studio (the working place).

That's a panacea
But the stickers more powerful turns. Especially if you stick some one on another with a small offset.

[максвп]

Akelathanks but with 3.0 N I understand everything more or less. I asked about P.
awakenthe bracelet on the monitor with the included video? or nadergat frame and wrap the bracelet in the print frames? or glue the printout of the frames to the bracelet?

[оуаакун]

awakenthe bracelet on the monitor with the included video? or nadergat frame and wrap the bracelet in the print frames? or glue the printout of the frames to the bracelet?

You can grub up frames and wrap. Or put the item on the screen. I have put screen pocket video player. But the label "Panacea without programs" more happened.

[максвп]

awakenthanks I'm going to do.

[АндрейКо]

Good evening!

Today I received my panacea.(wide from 10 units fishing line transparent-yellow-red)

While walking home from work, I decided to try the programmability.

Gave the command "menthol" - and really works!
(a pleasant chill went - switches very fast, maybe 2-3 seconds)
After a couple of minutes back.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
... With respect, andreiko

[АндрейКо]

I woke up realized that it is better to use a metered. Took seven hours in the morning.

But it so happened that at about 11 o'clock went to ISS(I think so - just the first time it happened) and returned to normal in 15 hours. (perhaps it is true that a third party something similar apply - it happened when the Director came - as you know, to sell me was nothing is impossible, because it represented for me was 2.1 and 1.0 three + mark on right arm from a panacea).

In my opinion, panacea takes control 2.1 - ie can be controlled via 2.1 mental panacea.(I will later check whether it is possible to translate them in different States - or just one - enough for today...)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
... With respect, andreiko

[АндрейКо]

A panacea is a miracle!

It has its own modular operating system.
(mental computer)

a lot of questions:
the amount of memory recorded programs, opportunities.(where are they stored?)
(compatibility of modules 2.1 and panacea - understood that can be paired in one mode 2.1 as a repeater...)

In General, the student of forty years I

[Михаил_]

limitations on resources, the modules are all the same, just in a 2.1 slope of the specifics of the device are slightly different.
The storage location is the world.