СтАвР wrote:Михаил_ wrote:1.
stream a group of people (a set of similar products, as well as on 1человека groups of 5 slots) effectively in small groups up to 20-25 people. Margin *2 slots +2000P for inclusion.
it is possible an example? something I do not understand

rate family

I don't understand how people can not understand the man who supposedly (if I'm not quite memento) were present at the demonstration of how to group... - here is an example.
everything is very simple, for the same 5 slots is included is reference to 1st person, the reference to the description of the group (not necessarily relatives), but the larger the group, the less personal use. This is not a proportional effect, i.e., by broadcasting for 25 people for one goes to not one-twenty-fifth, and approximately 30-50% of the norm, but far weaker than the "survival" skills in the cocoon. Ie stream and the effects it has, and learning not to no, but it is very weak.
For myself so not recommended, but for a group of people (e.g. employees, relatives) - is quite possible. Sometimes even necessary.
Thus, it is clear that the entire group is broadcast to the same set (since no personal settings, just no).
Binding such a group to broadcast some parameters, which we'll call "secondary factor with it," create a few more headaches for me, so the rate is the margin, in my opinion very reasonable.