Planned changes in the commodity row of the entire line BJ-SK, etc.

Locked
Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times
Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Михаил_ » Sat Oct 06, 2012 23:37

no.
The properties of the devices are identical.
They contain functionality similar to СК1м (the tasks of cistoca premises, protection of the operator and the TD - cm audio for СК1М)
Just the simple version of this functionality can only near a working computer to implement, and fancy - and offline, plus it is planned that later it can be with the phone programming (mode change).
Plus durable vandal-resistant housing which is difficult to crush or otherwise destroy.
Ie tricked out version in the mode of some "capsules" you can put it in your pocket and go with her somewhere. (for example).

User avatar
Светочек
Posts:44
Joined:Fri Aug 03, 2012 23:07
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Светочек » Sat Oct 06, 2012 23:51

Михаил_ wrote:Michael_
You do not get bored! bi
thanks to Your articles revealed their many useful qualities, properties. But something just became much more deliberate and evident. Of course, my practice is not limited to using only Your products. But the fact that without them it would have been much less interesting - it's a fact! Thank you! :o

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Михаил_ » Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:57


Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Михаил_ » Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:12

what type of Russian joke.

Владмосква
Posts:403
Joined:Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:14
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Владмосква » Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:45

Looked. And that this output2.avi does?

User avatar
Маг.нет
Posts:3310
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:48
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 142 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Маг.нет » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:30

.
:) Funny Portal, useful capacity on the ajna and above, interacts well from 3.0, more carefully "unhooks" from the World.





Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

димыч
Posts:480
Joined:Tue Jan 04, 2011 22:25
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by димыч » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:43

the half-minute file in one and a half gigs :shock: ETOGES go and not enough pixels at the monitor to display
well, as always, the question is whether or not the bracelet in the printout to wrap? :)
looked a couple of times, in the head some as strange, little ISS.
file makes sense to watch after downloading, online shows, 10 percent of the information inherent in the video
Last edited by димыч on Mon Oct 08, 2012 17:24, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Друид
Posts:145
Joined:Mon Aug 16, 2010 17:32
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Друид » Mon Oct 08, 2012 17:20

The size of the picture there, if I'm not mistaken, 1024x768. So any modern monitor intermeddle. And so much weight this is because each frame is unique and was not used standard video compression algorithms (they only erase most of the information), nothing surprising.

User avatar
Друид
Posts:145
Joined:Mon Aug 16, 2010 17:32
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Друид » Mon Oct 08, 2012 17:27

Маг.нет wrote: :) Funny Portal
I also have first impression about portal:) ("Black hole" in the sense of feeling - sucks there)

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Михаил_ » Mon Oct 08, 2012 17:56

well, actually it is super Lite 3.1, something a little more Lite would weigh quite a lot and I would be too lazy to download ( I have a channel, though wide, but the limit on gigs).
Yes, as was written above - the file size is huge because of the uniqueness of each pixel of each frame. The uniqueness shoved even to switch from a pixel of one frame to another pixel. Thus it was possible in a relatively short period to put regarding a lot of information. Just otherwise new technologies can not - information tens and hundreds of gig used.

User avatar
Петрос
Posts:449
Joined:Sat Feb 27, 2010 18:52
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Петрос » Mon Oct 08, 2012 19:36

Друид wrote: MAG.no wrote(a):
Funny Portal
I also have first impression about portal:) ("Black hole" in the sense of feeling - sucks there)

even I would say a few portals, much

User avatar
Маг.нет
Posts:3310
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:48
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 142 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Маг.нет » Mon Oct 08, 2012 20:15

.
Well, if the portal is considered a "short path" between 2 points, then there can be many (the number is accessible to consciousness "endpoints" of the transitions), I was referring to the Portal, not even the mechanism of "transition", and the area with "strange properties" - outside of our World and other Worlds. For forming the addresses of the endpoints (instead of cards) before the mental transition and useful potential range Agni and slightly above. And addictive....... there is a basis of the multidimensional structure of this shape, spiral clockwise (something similar to display inside the washer KV, but not round, and elipsoobraznoj shape with vertical and horizontal elongation of the plane and turns in the video displayed is not a lot, about a dozen - a small part of the total number of final structures).


Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

Дизо
Posts:17
Joined:Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:15
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Дизо » Mon Oct 08, 2012 21:12

Михаил_ wrote:https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8yB1q ... 2ZPbXU2UUE
be warned - the file is large.
Good people,
Unable to upload the file in parts for people? No speed and dropped connection I have all the time.
Thanks in advance.

User avatar
Логик
Posts:2073
Joined:Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:43
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Логик » Mon Oct 08, 2012 21:38

Michael_
In the properties of the specified file, without compression. But if you squeeze any codec effect it lost?
Painfully monstrous file size for 27 seconds of video.

User avatar
Маг.нет
Posts:3310
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:48
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 142 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Маг.нет » Mon Oct 08, 2012 21:40

.
Put it on the People you can, just what parts, he's just 27 seconds.......
For example the way the Chrome browser has a feature to resume interrupted downloads.




Sincerely, MAG.no 〠

User avatar
Петрос
Posts:449
Joined:Sat Feb 27, 2010 18:52
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Петрос » Mon Oct 08, 2012 21:41

MAG.no, Yes, portal, portals :)
I looked several times, dived into Explorer, went twice, the first time, after the countdown I got up, felt in the dark, something hostile, yelled at it and closed the balcony, I think something is wrong, Yes, I'm still asleep, woke up the second time :)

User avatar
Петрос
Posts:449
Joined:Sat Feb 27, 2010 18:52
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Петрос » Mon Oct 08, 2012 21:55

Маг.нет wrote:And tighten....... there is a basis of the multidimensional structure of this shape, spiral clockwise (something similar to display inside the washer KV, but not round, and elipsoobraznoj shape with vertical and horizontal elongation of the plane and turns in the video displayed is not a lot, about a dozen - a small part of the total number of final structures).
hmm, it affects Your powers of observation

User avatar
Маг.нет
Posts:3310
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:48
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 142 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Маг.нет » Mon Oct 08, 2012 22:35


Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Михаил_ » Mon Oct 08, 2012 22:58

compress there is no possibility - will be lost most of the data. So rejoice that not 200гиг :) as for the video of the full version (there is still not the video part)
in this video, 25 frames per second, the size of 1024*768, where each pixel is unique, both in color and in the parameters of the transition from its predecessor (the point that was in his place at the last frame).

Мастер 108
Posts:384
Joined:Tue Oct 19, 2010 23:46
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Мастер 108 » Mon Oct 08, 2012 23:31

Маг.нет wrote:.
roller 3.1 superlight in the Nation (1.5 GB)

Sincerely, MAG.no 〠
Thanks for the people from the People, and the Gugel formed due to frequent viewing...

User avatar
Светочек
Posts:44
Joined:Fri Aug 03, 2012 23:07
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Светочек » Tue Oct 09, 2012 0:07

:aa
Last edited by Светочек on Mon Feb 27, 2017 23:47, edited 2 times in total.

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:07

my advice, ignore the stupid terminology about the absolute and so on. And at the same time I would advise to hammer on Reiki (to comment on and discuss this then I will not, my opinion was already expressed, you want to find).

User avatar
Светочек
Posts:44
Joined:Fri Aug 03, 2012 23:07
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Светочек » Tue Oct 09, 2012 15:00

OK, Michael - based on Your beliefs about the world (for me, they are not yet Mature, I am at this stage more careful experimenter who listens to their feelings, eyeing the changes, etc., the main thing - do not overdo it and do not hurt)

so - based on Your worldview - what can you mean those sensations in the head? this question is interested in the context of 3.1 Lite
about absolute I mentioned not because I hold this point of view, and because we couldn't find more suitable words to describe.

P. S. in General, for such knowing, as I do, Your comments in this forum is like a grounding factor and I like it :-) because panochitas different information it is sometimes difficult to feel again that adequate contact with reality :wiz

P. P. S. read Your opinion on Reiki and found it to be very adequate, and I agree with Your conclusions about "good luck" of those who carry this practice to the masses, so to speak... My interest in Reiki is associated with my personal desire to increase the level of energy. And then Your product turned out to be much more effective (experience be sure to describe in another thread). I'm not a fan of any esoteric directions. But watching this area. My interest is more professional - I am a pragmatic and from time to time a very cynical journalist :ap

АМТ
Posts:88
Joined:Fri May 25, 2012 5:00

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by АМТ » Tue Oct 09, 2012 17:35

If we ignore the lyrics, then there is a sense of momentary transition in as 3.0 (as already customary, but not absolutely always easy caused). A very good feeling. In descriptive terms, like the changing camera that captures an event, with large-medium plan for...

Андрей С.
Posts:538
Joined:Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:25
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: proposed changes in trademark row the entire line BJ-SK

Post by Андрей С. » Tue Oct 09, 2012 18:34

Nifiga itself is super-light :shock: Now it is clear that 3.1 commercial take is not worth it, and that was a thought.
But the feelings, is still not quite in 3.0 shifts a little differently. Either too high, unusual power.

Locked