What's thisАндрей Кабанков wrote:Keep in mind that after you return to start the action module of the "fair return"
About the bracelets ( old theme,ported from the Gazebo )
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
"a Fair return"very specific purpose. It is involved in a situation that BJ (any version, including 1.0) was sold or otherwise transferred with the benefit of the manufacturer or by someone else (the owner, seller is not important, i.e. is the beneficiary in the acquisition BJ the new owner) and then have been requested and produced a complete return exchange. Not important version of the bracelet, it does not matter who sold and who made. This affects all producers, as we know of version 1.0 can do, including for sale all anyone. If the reason for return is not objective and people want to cheat, then this module will seek compensation from him through the events, and the seller will return a profit through events. Possible percent (depends on the situation). For those who don't believe in the work of BJ (a potential reason for a possible return) it may not be a problem because they do not believe in the operation of the module. If the return objective (this happens sometimes when there is a psychological conflict unconsciously with BJ and this is usually manifested immediately), the module is not activated. However, I cannot and do not affect the refund policy of different manufacturers and don't know how many of them (the technology is public for version 1.0 and do a lot of them where).
CIT. from here
CIT. from here
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Fully agree with you in this place. And in General, for your post I fully agree.bofara wrote:If the reason for return is not objective and people want to cheat, then this module will seek compensation from him through the events, and the seller will return a profit through events. Possible percent (depends on the situation).....
also -
-
Мастер 108
- Posts:384
- Joined:Tue Oct 19, 2010 23:46
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
You see these distortions or is it just discomfort on a physical level?Аррррр wrote: Well, only very slowly beginning to distort the field at waist level without any reason. This deformation was given some mild physical discomfort, not addressed and reasons were not seen. A few days not wearing this belt - the distortion eased a little of the energy mix in a little bit.
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
This is not the vision eyes but close
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
So, after all, something in itself, incorporated.. (?) .. and if this is not distortion, but just the company/vector (?)..Аррррр wrote:we Continue: when did art matrix "Lite" version of the bracelet on the strap. Since no effect was observed when worn, forgot about it almost. Well, only very slowly beginning to distort the field at waist level without any reason.
... I've written above about their "zhaleyka", and today mom took the bracelet that was loaded from the source (a charged, feel... even without "clouds" it).. and here rushed I have today is not the best and it was decided that the newly required period of "passing" - will juzat (itself verdict)
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
speculation removed and will be removed, there is neither the time nor the inclination to discuss it.
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Bracelets today returned to the office
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Please help Board!
The fact that I gave the order , after certain periods of time three bracelets of ordinary wood 2.0 , 2.1 and panacea their former employees.
Why the former - because she was caught stealing. From my purse was missing money. This is the last time, it was not odnokratno me notice. But the amounts are small, the values are not attached, the suspicions from itself from the metal. Since the worker knew 8 years , trusted her.
But when checking - theft revealed!
I the employee-thief drove! But in my head there was an obsessive desire to shoot with it all I gave you bracelets!
The other, more expensive gifts she made me I do not care.
But the bracelets be removed, direct compulsion.
And I struggle with this desire ( to remove her bracelets) for more than a month.
I was wondering: is it possible ( is it correct)to demand the return of donated bracelet?
Thanks in advance!
The fact that I gave the order , after certain periods of time three bracelets of ordinary wood 2.0 , 2.1 and panacea their former employees.
Why the former - because she was caught stealing. From my purse was missing money. This is the last time, it was not odnokratno me notice. But the amounts are small, the values are not attached, the suspicions from itself from the metal. Since the worker knew 8 years , trusted her.
But when checking - theft revealed!
I the employee-thief drove! But in my head there was an obsessive desire to shoot with it all I gave you bracelets!
The other, more expensive gifts she made me I do not care.
But the bracelets be removed, direct compulsion.
And I struggle with this desire ( to remove her bracelets) for more than a month.
I was wondering: is it possible ( is it correct)to demand the return of donated bracelet?
Thanks in advance!
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Well, the advise here is really hard, You know better. You can, if You really want to reset them to 1.0 version
Most likely this desire is not due to the necessity of action, and with a sense of wrongness recipient of bracelets.
It happens.....
In General, unless and until she wears them, maybe in her head that somehow will recover, at least partially.
Most likely this desire is not due to the necessity of action, and with a sense of wrongness recipient of bracelets.
It happens.....
In General, unless and until she wears them, maybe in her head that somehow will recover, at least partially.
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Thank You so much !
Please reset them to 1.0 version. I really want to .
Please reset them to 1.0 version. I really want to .
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Fulfill any whim of the client
done.
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Yes, there is the config not properly updated. And I ran away and had no time to test, is treated by manual intervention of the host.
Soon work.
Soon work.
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Tell me, please! Where can I read how to make BJ to 1.0. Throw a reference if not difficult.
- С. Альбатрос
- Posts:211
- Joined:Fri Sep 07, 2012 16:53
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
S. Albatross, thanks!
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Michael, a question for You.
Quite a lot of time studying this forum and the forum openmark, but never found the full clear explanation - what is cell the cloud?
In one of the branches OHMS You wrote that will explain this later.
If a full explanation somewhere, I apologize in advance as well as a link, if not please upload!
With respect.
Quite a lot of time studying this forum and the forum openmark, but never found the full clear explanation - what is cell the cloud?
In one of the branches OHMS You wrote that will explain this later.
If a full explanation somewhere, I apologize in advance as well as a link, if not please upload!
With respect.
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Alex.you must use a BJ, and because I believe in their favour, and, probably, has received no little confirmation of the fact that they changed your life for the better. I think that when you will be able to feel, to understand themselves and will have other questions (not "why" and "how"). Honestly, I feel bad FOR not feeling on how to effectively manage them. At the time, wanted to get answers on the ill-fated issues in order to appease the censor, the evaluator, requiring confirmation that all of this fits into my picture of the world, but modern issues qualitatively changed and set, for the last time, more to himself. I think real knowledge or understanding comes from within, you just have to learn to listen to yourself, after removing all foreign, artificial.
I think somewhere in OHMS and somewhere in the beginning Michael gave a rough exercise to work with TO. I am sure that any knowledge or understanding comes to man when he becomes ready for this and it happens by itself accidentally and casually. A prematurely innate knowledge is not valued by man in due measure and thereby closing this source of self-deception, that all that is needed I already took out.
Try to popularaty your desire for "lice": if it is your wish, it to be hooked and will find a way (maybe he needs to give a little to lie on the shelf until "his time"), and if external, someone else's, it will fall off after some time and no longer POPs up.
Of course this is all my personal opinion. Might have been something useful
I think somewhere in OHMS and somewhere in the beginning Michael gave a rough exercise to work with TO. I am sure that any knowledge or understanding comes to man when he becomes ready for this and it happens by itself accidentally and casually. A prematurely innate knowledge is not valued by man in due measure and thereby closing this source of self-deception, that all that is needed I already took out.
Try to popularaty your desire for "lice": if it is your wish, it to be hooked and will find a way (maybe he needs to give a little to lie on the shelf until "his time"), and if external, someone else's, it will fall off after some time and no longer POPs up.
Of course this is all my personal opinion. Might have been something useful
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Alex. All the explanations are sufficient for understanding user volume, this quite clearly. Nothing additional will not spread. The link will not give. Because 1. descriptions are scattered throughout the forum.
2. from a short text You will not use (do not understand, will not believe, etc.). Read the forums in General - all gathered in the big picture.
It's not cleaner to have the user manual from the "it's the start button".
2. from a short text You will not use (do not understand, will not believe, etc.). Read the forums in General - all gathered in the big picture.
It's not cleaner to have the user manual from the "it's the start button".
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
if you long to read the forum, most happening occurrence in the described picture of the world:) than understanding HOW it works.
and as a result, most people lost themselves, but not due to understanding.
but thanks for the advice, Petr99, maybe You're right in something.
and as a result, most people lost themselves, but not due to understanding.
but thanks for the advice, Petr99, maybe You're right in something.
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
1. I don't describe any picture of the world. I am opposed to rigid definitions.
2. there are a lot of people write complex programs for TB Panacea, which is the most advanced. Also manage within the tolerances allowed to associate in common complexes of my programs (they are already connected, but some people have their own goals and just other ideas). From what I draw the logical conclusion - that everything they're doing fine under those descriptions that have been given.
3. A basic description given in the description бж2.0
4. work with TO imply that You still perceive it as something normal. If you read three lines of the description, then You can just try to adjust our image library this description and get a guaranteed not.
To get what you need not "log in this picture" and get the minimum experience.
Then your perception will be based not on the fit for a different experience that is not related to BJ, and will svyazano with real experience instead of the bugs will come right understanding
Ie is the only working version.
5. if personal perception is not enough for a full understanding of the topic FOR, then just use it in passive mode, considering this is just a nice shortcut. Well, on a radio instrument you write there "Dolby" well, most don't know how "Dolby" is arranged, for example. Because there is no direct experience, but the description does not give a proper understanding of a drop. Handles feel necessary. All need this.
2. there are a lot of people write complex programs for TB Panacea, which is the most advanced. Also manage within the tolerances allowed to associate in common complexes of my programs (they are already connected, but some people have their own goals and just other ideas). From what I draw the logical conclusion - that everything they're doing fine under those descriptions that have been given.
3. A basic description given in the description бж2.0
4. work with TO imply that You still perceive it as something normal. If you read three lines of the description, then You can just try to adjust our image library this description and get a guaranteed not.
To get what you need not "log in this picture" and get the minimum experience.
Then your perception will be based not on the fit for a different experience that is not related to BJ, and will svyazano with real experience instead of the bugs will come right understanding
5. if personal perception is not enough for a full understanding of the topic FOR, then just use it in passive mode, considering this is just a nice shortcut. Well, on a radio instrument you write there "Dolby" well, most don't know how "Dolby" is arranged, for example. Because there is no direct experience, but the description does not give a proper understanding of a drop. Handles feel necessary. All need this.
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
Wolverine. Ban on the forum for a month. I said that the topic was closed, You instead think, continue to stubbornly stick to something there. How do You know that and when was that? and that is a simplified version of what? You personally attended? The forum is read by many people and I support at least the remnants of information order. I debate with you here on the pages of the rasstyagivat makes no sense. So messages deleted. The following message from You asking to place not earlier than February 24. Sorry that is harsh, but this is the only working method to restore order.
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
I have a question, there are 2 forums there are many references to various files such as the standard cartridges for vision, recording States are different, here's how to use them? Just listen with headphones and everything? or it is necessary to buy скм1 and listen through it?
Re: the bangles ( an old topic,moved from the Gazebo )
1. for W1 there are individual tracks.
2. W1 you can make yourself
3. they even listen to is not always necessarily all on the forum have read.
Sometimes it is enough background sound beyond audibility.
2. W1 you can make yourself
3. they even listen to is not always necessarily all on the forum have read.
Sometimes it is enough background sound beyond audibility.