Bracelets Life

[Маг.нет]

Place interesting (wonderful) picked up, if ZF (again, too....) included in the "pole" of the SHEMA as part (well, that's understandable), then BJ allocated like any other personal-individual "pole", it's a nice feeling, the whole multiple range SHEMA relates to a relatively small range BJ equal. Funny.......


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

Do not take the link on the website magazine(which your administrator free according to him the authority to do things in a certain gap) as a pole, except that personal perception leading shop, because, as I understand it, the technology it uses after verifying their effectiveness. In General appearance this section is purely a matter of commercial interests of a specific person (not me). Ie, politics and metamorphosis in a particular school has nothing to do.
It would be easier without the presence of my products there, but other than some not quite adequate personalities who merchandised my products there, there are quite adequate are not to blame for the presence of other . And the owner of the shop is more than adequate, I know him for a long time and one day saying Yes, they have no reason to refuse now. Although I would be happier without it in this neighborhood. Trends in the development of several projects are not the same, and it naturally will be noticeable. However, people are people and they are different everywhere.
I actively studied the SHEMA and used as a training base for the restoration itself, (for practices good feedback for effective self-control) a few years ago, but not a fan of the paradigm of school and do not agree with for the most part presents its picture of the universe.
However, cooperation in the field of view of the stakeholders actually effective products is considered quite adequate.
It's so... digression on the topic of published opinion about pole.
In other words, I would prefer to read the directory, just the directory and the presence of the link - just a link which is placed where the products of the schools ended and another began.
As for DF, it is still just a branch and not a pole. As far as I know Leo for many years in good standing with the BM, and in fact it's the same thing, just a question of redistribution of the fin. flows within their schools having strong geographic distribution.
By the way at an early stage without much enthusiasm we showed that they are ready to versatile cooperation (despite different views), but different attempts to question adequate response from the other side has not received and realized that the SHEMA is a thing in itself I frankly was somewhat surprised when some time later I received an offer to put the whole range on the shelf, head to the store. My initiative was not in it. But to deny reason not too.<

[АКВО]

It would be nice if the bracelets would be the engraved version of the bracelet, at least one link.

[вальча]

right, I support your suggestion

[Михаил_]

it would be great to raise the price 30%? about as it will take at tradernorton....
for all the latest BJ ebony version labeled method natsarapyvaniem on one level inside.
ACC. there is an inscription:
- P
-"2.1"
-"2.0"
there is no inscription on the bracelet 3.0, but their versions differ in appearance
2.6-2.7-2.8 and 2.5 is much different in appearance
an older version of the BJ on the black tree was no marking.
Engraving to do unfortunately really is difficult. With more mass production - possible. But while we're on the other side.

[TheMan]

Michael, tell me, how to combine between a BJ and artifacts SHEMA? How to combine BJ and machines SHEMA?

[Маг.нет]

My observations:

Often combined, in some cases, complementary, but you need to consider each case individually, as well as the combination of the used artifacts and machines SHEMA together.


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

In my opinion can be combined always (or BJ, you can specify it, because BJ does nothing but gives control to the subconscious).
Note that some artifacts SHEMA is pretty hard on the algorithms, it's not really ideologically the same as the essence of the BZ, but with a strong desire of the operator is settled not difficult direct team (actually should read command yourself to ignore the rigidity effect). BJ always activates the resource operator. gives it into the hands of method and energy, but doing something for him. For this reason, conflicts are not seen and if there are, then it is not a conflict with BJ... and by the bearer of the artifact power of the BZ.

[АП]

Logik wrote that he falls off the coating from the stone 2.6 bracelet. I have the same thing happens. one time filled in with epoxy, then stopped, and I wear a bracelet without coverage. above it was written that all bracelets are 2.x have the same engraving, it turns out that without the coating it acts as like 2.5 or 2.6? please explain.

[Маг.нет]

on the previous page

Michailoglou something to replace epoxy stone bracelet 2.6? Already worn out glue.

Yeah spit (figuratively) he has its properties recorded I think.

Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

2.6 how it works. And otbelivanie coverage due to some personal qualities of the operator and the material (seen on the stone mostly on the black tree not even complained like no one). Thought at first that only material. But statistics show that one material made 2.6 someone "peel" and someone remain as it is and stay long without any problems. It is what is peeling off for example 2 link and then the process stops. Conventionally we assume the brightness of the manifestation of 2.6 for a particular operator. Without cover, it has no 2.5 will not (quality fixed), but the manifestation of 2.6 will be somewhat softer.

[Витал]

Good time of day. Michael, you said that bracelet if they do not manage is working to harmonize the General condition. On my left hand hanging 2.6, 2.1 and 3.0 Lite 2.0 on the right, if you try to turn them on again to resolve the problem in the body whether it is harmful. Because in order to work, the car needs gas, immediately as fuel for bracelets even for the same launch energy is required, as I understand it from the space, and loved me. Further, if each bracelet to give a different action program example: include 2.6 for the passage of air on health, 2.1 recharge energy program 2.6 , 3.0 include module remove interference to obtain results at 2.6, 2.0 to turn on de-energization of parasitic pumping from the body...and so on. What I am is, in the passive wearing of the bracelets is the development of the aura, or only the promotion of health in General? How long do I need to do the build-up modules deliberately, so that the same aura for example could develop sledovatelno store and get more energy to work with the same bracelets. What would you recommend?
sincerely Vital.

[Маг.нет]

Monitoring User BJ:

The bracelets connect to the "outlet" from the outside, the energy is not taken from a certain point in the surrounding space, and in General planetary channels.
Bracelets is an interface to the subconscious, and his natural program, activating them, nothing new is introduced, you just receive the possibility of their (algorithms) conscious use.
Modules in all models 2.0-2.x the same, if a couple of bracelets used at the same time, it is not necessary to activate focusing on the different bracelets, the subconscious (control, drive) one of the algorithms (engines) can be different, can work simultaneously, although it is possible to prioritize qualities 2.x.
3.0 is a different story, there are no Modules, there is an effective state of the Creator.
The aura and the health of interdependent elements, changing health, changing aura and Vice versa.


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

Vital, and wrote a MAG.no, the bracelets provide an external (from the biosphere, the world) the flow of energy to implement a given. The longer you actively and consciously use, the greater will be the benefit for health and for You in General. Health and the manifestation of other personal qualities and abilities do not completely separable. This is a single Energo-informational structure of man's cocoon.
Not BJ different versions performs some external work with You, and You are on a subconscious and conscious level it is done at the expense of new resources introduced BJ (energy and methods + activation of the subconscious). And the result will be and when wearing the passive and active modules running. When active faster. BUT we should remember that it is not necessary to overload itself (feels like) especially the first time, an overly large number of tasks launched through the modules BJ.
As active or passive operation with BZ, increasing the capacity of the provider and its capabilities. For example, the limit of energy that the operator can get from BJ, is limited only by the operator, not BJ. Looking for BJ in order not to hurt and not to overload the operator and diminishes the flow of energy if there is excess is harmful to the cocoon.
Training on the practical use of the energy for the tasks You do increase the possibility of consumption of energy and at the same time its available maximum. I.e. imagine doing better.
How to train muscles not used will atrophy, which is used - develops.

[Витал]

No MAG wrote:3.0 there are no Modules, there is an effective state of the Creator. Michael, how to work more effectively 3.0, since there are no modules?
sincerely Vital.

[Маг.нет]

Monitoring User BJ:

Modules are used to correct (change existing) World - information components of structures.
The state of the Creator implies a "fusing" of new structures.
To work in as 3.0 should be able to get there and to stay there.
Panacea (and other BJ) contributes to "admission" in this area of the cocoon (availability status). Workout of being in this state help to hold there.


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

Without the ability to hold the state itself effects 3.0 from 3.0 are in terms of correction of the cocoon in the direction of harmonization and removing the distortion (component reference), but it will still help to get closer to the hold state 3.0.
On this basis, many people do not need to wait for 3.0 from some awesome effects but bears it out - useful. Although we meet people who are on the move, at first contact 3.0 will recognize this condition and can keep themselves without BJ. However there is not enough.
While the 3.0 in the effective form is not available, the impact of 3.0 on the flow of events will still be, but it would be appropriate to use the other modules of the BZ. From the point of view of the impatient effectively reasonable alternating 2.5 and 2.6 (the generation of new probabilities and their implementation).

[Natalyy]

Today I bought a 2.1.
It turns out my hand is small for these links if you remove the 3 - level is where the clock usually people wear, just as a square (well, that is, to lay down be, but not in all places. ). And I do not understand how such a node to impose...

[Маг.нет]

Can be worn higher than a watch, and you can zoom as you prefer.
About the redial link, and the node may find useful information here.


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

Today I bought a 2.1.
It turns out my hand is small for these links if you remove the 3 - level is where the clock usually people wear, just as a square (well, that is, to lay down be, but not in all places. ). And I do not understand how such a node to impose...

well the truth and can be higher to shift, even on the shoulder....links easily cleaned.... while people are often asked for "more"
Soon there will be technology transfer for all types of BZ, in addition to 3.0, which will allow the model 2.x BJ to put on their favorite items by wearing what is comfortable.

[Маг.нет]

I. e. it can be applied (transferred) for example 2.5 or 2.6 on one shirt, then another, and the shape of the bracelet is not mandatory? What about the mass of an object? What will happen to CO? Ie there will be some special requirements to the object to which you are transferring?


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

1. Yes, that's right. Any 2.x, including the panacea (i.e. 2.0, 2.1, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, panacea and panacea mode 2.9) on any object. Well, CONVENIENT for uniform exposure to take the bracelet at the same time. But any your. For example - watch moreover there are different of different materials. For example, there are watches where the case and strap made of precious wood but to solve already wearing.

But you can on the shirt. However with the relatively small size of the field migration for uniform adhesion to the shirt will have its very compact roll, but it's roboski available. Especially useful for example in the summer-short sleeves and the bracelets, if you interfere because of the dress code can be removed.

2. There are no special requirements to the object which is transferring THERE. Ie item of clothing or wearable thing. It just relieves the usual recommendations for a BJ bracelet at its optimum. But may be for example a belt (but the impact will be slightly the other way in some cases, that many may find useful, especially men )

3. TO after removing any 2.x remains on the operator and if does not command him to go away, it will be there almost indefinitely. This is with the 2.0 from the usual. So with nothing original will not.

4. The mass of an object is not inherently important. Well, judge for yourself. When I published the matrix a panacea, people drew pieces of paper and then for a long time caught by the serious effects of this light-the light of a panacea.... the mass of an object becomes important when you need to drive a large flow of energy or to absorb something in a situation, and so on and not about the cocoon. And when it is more than possible TO. In this case, the damping factor will be a true carrier 2.x, namely the one that is the basis for technology transfer. And the object to which you are transferring is at this point projecting relatively speaking. The effectiveness of manifestation the option to make identical to the normal bracelet.

5. Technology transfer will have separate objects for each version (well, the panacea at the same time as always - switchable) and transfer may be carried out repeatedly. But not to be confused with copying. Ie is generated is always "charged" object, predecessor thus loses any properties but it still slabovrajenne (depending on usage time) properties бж1.0.<

[Маг.нет]

Interesting. Did I understand correctly that:
- 2 quality.x and TD are each 2.x on the individual carrier?
- the same hours from the example, you can now "charge" 2.5, 2.6 tomorrow and so on?
- these "carriers" can still be used, for example for charging water BJ 2.0?
- what is the expected effect if you just have a nearby, for example in the bag?
- "medium Cure" can also be "reprogrammed" as a bracelet?
- what shape and size of these "carriers", materials?
- pricing policy?


Sincerely, MAG.no

[Михаил_]

1. Yes, on the individual.
2. Yes you can change the source of the transfer.
3. Yes, you can. But the subject or subjects treated only with the transfer, i.e. when processing a new object from the old - removed quality. So watch to make 2.5 / 2.6 you must first 2.5 "to retract, i.e. to move on to something else
4. In the bag I think the effect will be comparable with a similar version of BJ's in the bag.
5. The carrier can be reprogrammed prior to porting. Well, if you have the ability or the programmer.
6. form of media - a plastic card of small thickness, well more likowski (bracelet to fit) ie relatively probably 9x12 or 10x15. The material is determined. Or 5mm thick cast or laminate the transparent film. The inner contents - holo-stick panacea programmed a number of programs associated with the job mentioned. Rather a whole stack of those. Bow to the laminated film version, but we'll see how big the difference in power and how justified one and another application. The thick pile is not comfortable to wear.
7. I think the pricing will be identical to the prices on the ACC. version and rising prices of 2.x will not grow.

[Маг.нет]

Thank you for understanding.
These products are still in the future or already have tentative date of release?
Just enough to keep the card? And how much time you need to transfer?
"Property 2.x" must be transferred to another object or to return the card?
At a uniformity of 2 bracelets BJ.x and "clean", the difference after treatment of "pure" comparable?



Sincerely, MAG.no