Bracelets Life

Александр11 · Post by **Александр11** » Thu Mar 03, 2011 20:50

Thanks Sneaker!

Сатурн · Post by **Сатурн** » Sat Mar 05, 2011 20:04

I don't remember exactly but I think in this stripped wrote that СК1м BJ 2.0 supports doing both of them BJ format 2.7 or 2.8, I felts missed how this is done or not ponil. can anyone suggest how to do it. and did anyone like that?

Post by **Маг.нет** » Sat Mar 05, 2011 20:06

СК1М embedded in BJ 2.0 as "external factor" that is always close to 2.0... he's not "remakes", but it helps to demonstrate (through its properties) any 2.x-quality more clearly.
And that's just one of it (СК1М) capabilities.

Sincerely, MAG.no

Сатурн · Post by **Сатурн** » Sat Mar 05, 2011 20:12

and what should be done to БЖ2.0 manifested these qualities (2.x)?

Post by **Маг.нет** » Sat Mar 05, 2011 20:24

You need to have 2.... x, which is 2.0 "caused" a shift of one or another quality.
СК1М these qualities, too, "knows", but he seems to be on the outside, and BJ with the internal, when using a manifest in different ways...

Sincerely, MAG.no

Сатурн · Post by **Сатурн** » Sat Mar 05, 2011 20:31

so not enough to have СК1м and BJ 2.0 , you have to have a BJ older versions to BJ 2.0 with СК1м showed qualities BJ 2.x. do I understand correctly?

Post by **Маг.нет** » Sat Mar 05, 2011 20:41

Each piece is self-sufficient, so the question of obligation is not very... let's say correct. It's all tools, each is good in their own way (with his personality in addition to the General qualities). Well compare is a simple example that is more important than a drill, a screwdriver, pliers or a hacksaw? With BJ and SK will get a similar response... if unnecessary screws to remove (Unscrew clamped in the Chuck of a drill or just a screw driver or pliers... or to cut with a hacksaw...). And if anything else??? I hope the analogy is pertinent and clear example. What extras can 2.x is in their descriptions.

Sincerely, MAG.no

Петрос · Post by **Петрос** » Mon Mar 07, 2011 21:57

Question Michael. Made a bracelet to her father, but the bracelet is not yet reached. Father fell ill with pneumonia. When he dress is it reasonable to run once "timer healer"?

Михаил_ wrote:1. the timer can be run, no problem.

Three days after his father put the bracelet (wore on the third day after he was in the hospital), he was ready to be discharged, stayed for another two days for observation and was discharged today. And took him to the resuscitation, choking and occassinal with blood. When wearing a bracelet as it was "mid-priced". Well, I started from "Timer healer", the modules are painted per day, twice per day to run each module.

Post by **Михаил_** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:31

if the father is willing to wear some BJ - he'd better else to do... all the situation was obviously serious, the body needs more resources for recovery.

Петрос · Post by **Петрос** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:39

thanks, will try. by the way, father said that on the other hand he had some kind of magnetic bracelet. Not to interfere? As for me, I would have deleted it ))

Post by **Михаил_** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:47

I would also have removed...

Малика · Post by **Малика** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 14:35

1.0 L and flowers:there was a pot of flowers, popularly called "good morning", usually with green leaves, and gave me seedlings with purple leaves and blooms pale purple bells. Three years-ago 4 is mercilessly ripped off, apparently took the seedlings and left only three of the spine, since he was not bred, and protruded three stalks and sometimes puny bloomed, put to him all your cards, didn't help. When did the matrix, I wrote it in this pot, too, for 14 stems and a bunch of sprouts, I am very pleased

Петрос · Post by **Петрос** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 16:59

my cat broke six months ago, two orchids, one didn't flower and the other has withered, the leaves are dried through the clear pot it was evident that the roots turned yellow. Painted a week ago two pots. The roots have barely started to turn green, let's see what will happen next.

верунчик · Post by **верунчик** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 16:13

Don't know in what section to write

From my experience:
Worked through the "Diamond system" of the BZ. Works well!
For example: take the axis - top (the upper chakra heat) and Bottom (lower chakra cold) and are working on.
Universal

:
"trust your subconscious mind to use all the features of the bracelets and their modules to balance the energies in the axis Heat-Cold. Directed his attention to this axis, or any other, right axis, Meridian, chakras, etc. Solar chakra as well.

Малика · Post by **Малика** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 21:36

Thank you!

Светлана Веклина · Post by **Светлана Веклина** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 13:40

Hello, friends!
In June waiting for force majeure. In order to prepare themselves fully armed, prompt, please, what bracelets it is better to buy: 2.5 or 2.6, two or one is enough? Wear 2.0 is more than six months and the money is not quite everything went smoothly. Count very much on your advice.

Post by **Маг.нет** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 15:19

Force majeure - circumstances force majeurean insurmountable... perhaps that is why it is better not to try to overcome, and to look for any "workarounds" involving the circumstances of the impossibility of "crossing" with irresistible force, or to neutralize the effects of such a collision, or the use of this power to their benefit:), there are other ways, but it is the lyrics...

As for the bracelets, with force majeure, they handle not! But unable to add resource (energy supply and additional "flexibility") to the Operator that often has a positive effect on his (Operator's) capabilities in the current circumstances.

Ie if the probability of a "positive decision" Yes, the bracelets can contribute is to "push" in the right direction, to speed up the process, to readjust (and harmonize mutual influence) with others the processes that affect the course "positive decision"... but if the probability of a "positive decision" is minimal or absent completely, the bracelets may not help you... "punching" the primary solution, but can contribute in the choice of "workaround", etc. circumstances, leveling as a period of unavoidable processes, and their consequences.

This is not advice, and meditation on the...

Sincerely, MAG.no

Петрос · Post by **Петрос** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 15:33

Светлана Веклина wrote:In June waiting for force majeure.

Маг.нет wrote:force majeure - force majeure,

Add:
From the General theory of contractual obligations. Force majeure it is impossible to foresee at the time of conclusion of the contract, to prevent them, it is impossible to avoid or prevent the consequences.

Post by **Михаил_** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 15:33

Yes.... the main issue in the flexibility of the operator... a person buys the bracelets (the real story), at the same time СК1М and so on... and wants to push through a project (already started), which according to verbal description and in the external professional opinion, does not necessarily CAN develop positively, i.e., may have really an insurmountable situations that depend on the external world, but not from project participants. Wait for one maaalenky project will change azhno the whole world - well, this is something.... well, strange... the result of applying the older versions of the BZ and SC project man abruptly begins to slow down, and everything becomes advance BAD.
In my opinion this is an obvious signal that we should not wait until the thunder clap, and we need urgently to change course entirely. But people have decided that it is a personal incompatibility and stayed the course. Consequences not known to me.... When something starts to be wrong - I change course to one in which "so" much in advance....
Yeah, BJ probably can help maneuvering in unusual situations (and 2.5. and 2.6) but the idea that "waiting for a train" I really don't like conceptually, because it is also your approach to the assessment of the situation, the programming itself, and so on....
Sometimes it is enough to change my rating.
Again, if the money is not much, then you can do 1.0... assure a very effective piece. Free.

Светлана Веклина · Post by **Светлана Веклина** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 19:14

Маг.нет wrote:
As for the bracelets, with force majeure, they handle not! But unable to add resource (energy supply and additional "flexibility") to the Operator that often has a positive effect on his (Operator's) capabilities in the current circumstances.

Ie if the probability of a "positive decision" Yes, the bracelets can contribute is to "push" in the right direction, to speed up the process, to readjust (and harmonize mutual influence) with others the processes that affect the course "positive decision"... but if the probability of a "positive decision" is minimal or absent completely, the bracelets may not help you... "punching" the primary solution, but can contribute in the choice of "workaround", etc. circumstances, leveling as a period of unavoidable processes, and their consequences.

Sincerely, MAG.no

What do I need. Judging by the reviews of the forum, for solving my problem would be enough for a couple of briketov 2.5 and 2.6, but not enough money. It is for this reason and ask you, the members, of the Council. It can be one thing each to buy and all are still with pair of 2.6 to start?

Again, if the money is not much, then you can do 1.0... assure a very effective piece. Free.

I have on hand around the clock bracelets 2.0. Like mentioned, what stronger 2.0 1.0. Or I not so understood? Yes, and with any technique I You. I won't be able independently to do something.

Post by **Маг.нет** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 20:36

And why the question about a pair?

It's the same 2.0 but with a certain "bias" towards one aspect of energy. Ie, the app vector. I think a proper example of, "Once a Swan, cancer and pike...", so, if 2хБЖ2.5, it is not 2 "Swan," and still single, but "thicker" (stronger than 1хБЖ2.5). Based on these considerations, with limited budget for 2 units, for example I would choose one 2.5 and 2.6... I mean "Swan" and "pike", albeit a bit "thinner" (less "mass"), but then in the "water" and "air" I, as Operator, have aides... Power all sorts of needs - different important...

Specifics of "skew" 2.5 and 2.6, it is a manifestation of the different aspects trenchlines model - hetero and Homo principles (the description is on this page:
http://www.mindmachine.ru/viewtopic.php ... &start=100 ). Well, if purely from a User point of view, in my opinion 2.5 adds invariance (a variety of choices, the correct choice is a luck:), i.e., due to the invariance and the correct choice can increase the luck), and 2.6 stabilizing, it reinforces the chosen direction (of course nourishment for the User) - a kind of "punching" option (again there is some consonance with success:), if the selection is correct, then there are tendencies to its successful completion). This is only a personal opinion of one of the Users from his point of view, and as you know - how many people, so many opinions, there is until you try it's hard to judge... it really is.

Abstract example. There is a current task, with 2.5 I activate the unconscious consideration of possible (harmonious) choice of solutions, and then consciously (or unconsciously) making the most balanced choice, increase the probability (due to additional energopodachi) 2.6. Ie 2.5 - organizes the selection, and 2.6 - enhances the selected direction.

It is not the fact that BJ will help in resolving the situation (although the User benefit as BJ and there's the difference between 2.0, 2.5, 2.6 may not be very noticeable). So choose You anyway and then that may be "responsible" in pushing to the wrong choice, but it is possible that the Council may benefit if it turns out for future use. Therefore, such issues for advice to the author is better BJ... he always has an opinion... which is sometimes at odds with the opinion of Users, perhaps due to look at the issue from different angles, from different points of view. User reviews - often an individual, when they are. I for example, for some products so any Feedback:)User didn'T SEE it... Alas.

To choose You, to understand, listening to better themselves.

Sincerely, MAG.no<

Светлана Веклина · Post by **Светлана Веклина** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 23:12

Thank you, thank you very much!

Post by **Михаил_** » Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:12

The eponymous couple BJ 2.x (2.5 or 2.6 for two) probably too much, especially for started using them.
You can even start with one of them.
For example 2.6. And only after getting used to add 2.5, not immediately and not at the same time.

MAG.no - and I wonder what kind of product is, for which there was not a single opinion? Although I like no idea how to write reviews for AF and AK - on the future of the Ah series are sometimes not clear what is the contribution of some of the extensions and more generally what it is. Ie is not just to distinguish. I feel the difference with it in my pocket without them. And I'm afraid that further such difficulties may be greater.

Post by **Маг.нет** » Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:35

Михаил_ wrote:MAG.no - and I wonder what kind of product is, for which there was not a single opinion? Although I like no idea how to write reviews for AF and AK - on the future of the Ah series are sometimes not clear what is the contribution of some of the extensions and more generally what it is. Ie is not just to distinguish. I feel the difference with it in my pocket without them. And I'm afraid that further such difficulties may be greater.

Respecting the interest, not only extensions for the at... there are a few products (some of which are presented as parts of a larger system, the other self-sufficient), but Your explanations and reviews of my other responses have been found.

As for AF and AK You now (not just now, but for many times) designated test method for comparison of "with and without", but alas... "no, no."

Even Your system to "bonus incentives" why not give that feedback

Not working? Problems with the regulation? Or is it another problem? Maybe the response is in personal correspondence, but for some reason they are hidden? The question is not about the details of the correspondence, but at least on the interference of one sort or another efficiency and usefulness of the products.

Why such a question? I think not only me would like to make a more informed choice for purchases based not only on the descriptive part of the product and trust You. Especially to understand why the sticker engraving can cost 15 sput and too time-consuming to produce, the product of SK, ISS 2, etc.

Sincerely, MAG.no

Post by **Михаил_** » Mon Apr 04, 2011 13:19

Begin with the end

The explanation of value.
In the value of the mortgaged three factors. My understanding of the product (and it's probably not objectively), the complexity of manufacturing and used hardware resource and an estimate of the components associated with the development and production, i.e. it's not exactly intellectual property (I do in fact not really any, I admit), how much impact that spent any money on equipment or the creation of technology.
Basically, the effect on the result provides the second factor.
But sometimes not only.
To compare without knowing the specifics of the technological process is difficult.
Here, for example 2.1 for the artificially low price. By not accounting for the third paragraph. In other words, to ensure charging 2.1 use expensive additional equipment and the fact of charging, blocks, special room (similar to EC) for a day or more, preventing to produce other products out there.
The creation of the second such premises is associated with significant costs to us that may not pay off for a very long time.
For at - the production process is very time consuming, although it is just a sticker. Is connected with the peculiarities of the material, so that the engraved two-layer and plastic is thin and easy to burn. In addition, there are features of work of the engraver and used drawing and technological process - as a result of at are not made commercially, but literally of a piece. It is expensive for the life of the equipment and operator time.
Sri-2 - here, the value PP3 is formed and other factors. Time is not expensive. But was costly both in time and in investments in technology,and their development (though this applies to all "in glass"). We order the edition - get it.... now the process is simplified, although the raising of the copies will hit the performance of third-party equipment is involved (is not a serial, unique...)

SK - time-consuming product is in manual mode, though put on domestic production for a long time, but manual labor is not going anywhere (there is no automated elements)... the Value of SK, based on time spent on the production is a bit low, but this production is more commercially than at, simultaneously made of several devices, all the stages are similar to conveyor. Earlier (at the start of their sales) SK has been underestimated in cost. Now they are adequate. Since all honed to perfection and really with them no more fuss than with the at, there are about 11 stages of production, each of which is made with several future devices.

Therefore, for each product are different factors to determine what in my opinion is a "reasonable cost" that takes into account different factors of production and development.<