Stabilizer.

АндрейКо · Post by **АндрейКо** » Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:27

I'm just amazed at the efficiency of the Stabilizer! (an IED)

Only 1 anchor (put in the act of a man trying to drain me more detail I can not describe...) . Delivered yesterday evening and in the morning has become a different situation

Thank You, Michael!

Мастер 108 · Post by **Мастер 108** » Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:12

Михаил_ wrote:is There except the "process" when it is clearly observed, and still have all the subsequent process of use, and if the ratio operator and the regulator (in terms of megalomania) is not very suitable, the operator will be hard.

And very (well, on a very

) big (in terms of megalomania

) Ck operator will not become hard?

Post by **Михаил_** » Tue Sep 08, 2015 12:54

АндрейКо wrote:I'm just amazed at the efficiency of the Stabilizer! (an IED)

Only 1 anchor (put in the act of a man trying to drain me more detail I can not describe...) . Delivered yesterday evening and in the morning has become a different situation

Thank You, Michael!

.... the stabilizer is a great thing.... it is a pity few people are aware of this

I rarely make them pretty, although commercial, they are "vigorous" power

Post by **Михаил_** » Tue Sep 08, 2015 12:55

just if you look for example how many people picked up those same arbiters..... oddities of perception

this is in tune with things... like two wings and opposite impact on the operator and his mind, and just in General too.

Галатея · Post by **Галатея** » Thu Sep 10, 2015 0:37

Hello Michael. Tell me, what is more effective to use for purposes of Stabilizer or СК1М + map Pandora VIP? 've been looking at these products, but if СК1М understand how to work (put a piece of paper with purpose on the stage), then with the Stabilizer I can't figure out how to do it. Soul located more to the Stabilizer. Can you explain how to work with Stabilizer in terms of goals? Or better to take something that is more clear for me (i.e. СК1М)?

АндрейКо · Post by **АндрейКо** » Thu Sep 10, 2015 2:39

Galatea Stabilizer, if you do not understand what they are doing is potentially very dangerous device.
It is recommended to protect even from accidental unauthorized access. (rearrange anchor and what will happen? - say, kitten paw play....)
To compare the efficacy can not (there is only samodel). I need both devices (three IC is not enough, as locations for the anchors on the Stabilizer...)
In my opinion the SC is much more secure.

For example SK (gave an IED) wife learned to use in a couple of weeks and my Stabilizer her goosebumps and all my explanation does not take... (he says this is pure magic, as in fairy tales saucer

)

You decide, but it is better to re-read all that is on the Stabilizer. (but an IED Stub to do in my opinion is easier than SC).

Can You all recommend to do to start a paper and try.

Андрей Ермаков · Post by **Андрей Ермаков** » Thu Sep 10, 2015 15:28

Galatea IMHO of course, if you buy СК1М, the stabilizer will do easily. While'll learn how to do, understand and how it works, and how to use

.

Галатея · Post by **Галатея** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 1:55

Thank you for the advice. About Stabilizer read everything, but unfortunately not understand how to work with it

. Most likely stop at СК1М + map Pandora.

Андрей Ермаков · Post by **Андрей Ермаков** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 5:33

Galatea You are right, you need to buy what you know... And if you do not understand about the stabilizer, so you ask

. This forum (and all forums) to exchange experiences.

Post by **Михаил_** » Sat Sep 12, 2015 22:42

Let us stabilizer and the UK is still very different and very good inter-complementary instruments.
Both can be done independently, Yes, ск1м in this respect for the ladies looks to manufacture much more difficult.
To use????? I don't know.
As for me, so the stabilizer is even easier.
They work in different ways and for different fuels and different areas of opportunity, so what can I say? - not will also make the stabilizer and Vice versa.
The stabilizer is in most cases much more effective than SK. What is there, and not a lot of reviews.

At the same time to master the Stabilizer is not too difficult. Zones (by their names) have the following properties. Anchors tied to your process/trends/challenges/you can even parts of the body

if it's body work for example

And can we put these to the development/inhibition/stop/law/creativity/chaos and it has the appropriate titles consequences. We can remove them from the field and to combine programs or work with them to place on the field - surprisingly flexible and capacious, multi-tasking tool.
It is better to understand than to be afraid and not use it at all!
Galatea, I recommend to deal with stabilizer. Ask what is not clear.

арте:м · Post by **арте:м** » Sat Sep 12, 2015 23:41

Михаил_ wrote:Ask that is not clear.

are there any recommendations how to work with the stabilizer, which is in the format of a broadcast made? exclusively the mental field and to provide the location of the anchors? or it is possible to outline schematically a piece of paper and assign it to the "interface" to the translational stabilizer or magnetic available with chips to use and command that their position represents and coincides with the configuration of the stabilizer?
can anyone to share their experiences in this matter?

Андрей Ермаков · Post by **Андрей Ермаков** » Sun Sep 13, 2015 12:42

IMHO it is paper to bring it to assign (to start very convenient and good). You can simply charged via the AT2 cell.0 just write for example Anchor 1 on the zone music etc. And to designate a folder where the control files or one file and write it to assign. You can do both, for one does not hurt

. So in the mind will be the image stabilizer.

Post by **Михаил_** » Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:49

Андрей Ермаков wrote:IMHO it is paper to bring it to assign (to start very convenient and good). You can simply charged via the AT2 cell.0 just write for example Anchor 1 on the zone music etc. And to designate a folder where the control files or one file and write it to assign. You can do both, for one does not hurt . So in the mind will be the image stabilizer.

Well, just use at with no experience with the physical stabilizer is bad....

Post by **Михаил_** » Tue Sep 15, 2015 3:14

Not really sure the first tip about the paper is the most correct.
To work well with PA should have experience working with physical. As they come together, there is no problem to use paper first, and then learn to do it imaginatively in the mind.
With at the problem that the anchor well is not just in the sector, and feel that often pulls the hand to a particular place...
In the mind all the same.
When the broadcast began, a few people from the test group coped with the transition to translational experience with a stabilizer including someone self-made. Just change your tactile-intuitive and logical skill to the same but in a virtual projection.
Imagine a virtual stub beside him, and with him work - very convenient. Always in abundance of all the programs and anchors and power is large and no one is hurt and the storage space is

АлексейН · Post by **АлексейН** » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:14

Have a paper homemade.
You do not have translational.
Sometimes figuratively represent a stub and how to put anchors on it... Works

But still want the commercial to do so. Not now, later.

МерКаБа · Post by **МерКаБа** » Sat Sep 19, 2015 20:02

I finally finished your concrete stabilizer. Turned out he weighs about 1.5 tons.
If you think to do such a giant in the next 2 days curing the base layer (clay, ylang and beeswax), suggest somewhere to sit and don't go outside and even more so for a wheel)) bounce painfully intense. Then everything becomes normal.
I have in the manufacturing process, with concrete miracles just happened. As I hadn't measured the proportions, still in some places staba, as if not enough cement. Although everything was brought to perfection, even the mixer I bought. The cement is fresh, straight from the factory, 500 brand.
While the concrete is still in some places "dusty".
Michael_ tell me, please, is it possible stabilizer cover film, cover with a thin layer of soil to plant Gazenko, and on top lay the stones zone, like Stonehenge. Or the earth will "dim" much?
For anchors I have epoxy stabilizers. And concrete I have done for communication in a single unit small and medium-sized stable.

Александър · Post by **Александър** » Sat Sep 19, 2015 23:10

Merkaba, thank you for the great review!
And you can write a more detailed report about how it did everything, proportions, materials, diameter and thickness of the stabilizer - in short all the information you will find it possible to share. I think that now voicing the desire of many friends of the forum.

МерКаБа · Post by **МерКаБа** » Mon Sep 21, 2015 14:50

Diameter is 2 meters, the original height of 40 cm, but it turned out more because I have covered once already dusty layer.
The proportions of 1/3 concrete without the gravel. Only the lower layer with a high content of stones, the tree roots from the bottom climbed.
Vivaladisco ylang, beeswax and clay according to the instructions.
Mandalas have been printed on a laser printer and was laid every 10 cm of concrete.
On the recommendation of Michael for amplification were used the welder and the water hose.
That's all the nuances)

Александър · Post by **Александър** » Mon Sep 21, 2015 15:54

Thank you, Merkaba, your experience is very valuable!

ММ · Post by ММ » Tue Sep 22, 2015 0:52

Someone give step-by-step photos or seen how to work with stabilizer. Don't be lazy.

I will be very grateful.

АлексейН · Post by **АлексейН** » Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:40

MM, but if You do not get to the Prosecutor's office? No-no

Post by **Михаил_** » Tue Sep 22, 2015 21:07

how to draw a picture ? and You in what style? what is the canvas ? maybe on iPad in the graph editor ? .... it is a creative object. Depending on the task and the nature of personality, the current situation and the degree of "granulation" of tasks into smaller components, you can apply 100 different approaches, some of which is described in available materials.
Because I don't understand what may not be clear - it is necessary to formulate SPECIFICALLY:
1) what device is used (paper/cast/concrete/translation/homemade/commercial)
2) what is the purpose
3) how it is divided into several components for the stimulation of desirable and stopping are not desirable.

Post by **Михаил_** » Thu Sep 24, 2015 17:43

They plan to launch the new products on the principle of the stabilizer. The main idea is that horizontal communication when you build the world and replace the region 2.8 on the area of the LM. In the actual Assembly of the world both the process involved, but when used by humans of the unipolar system (because the stabilizer is so like his own personal projection) can theoretically arise a skew. Practically, right now this can be a very effective practical tool. Estimated time of issue - the end of October. Anchor/software system remains the same, although it will be slightly updated. The classical model of the stabilizer when it is not going anywhere and would like to continue to be produced and operated with high and reliable efficiency. Just added "the look" from the other side.

Дельтус · Post by **Дельтус** » Sun Nov 08, 2015 16:12

Michael I have a question.Released basically a new product on the principle of the stabilizer.And the second question read fully the thread and never found what to do with three identical aluminium pots .hose .and pump.and a container of water. the main direction is not clear it's about 3 pelvis.

Post by **Михаил_** » Tue Nov 10, 2015 1:25

.... the product will go on sale in December....
three bowls to be used two to invest in one another with a gap between and used as part of a path to the top of the arrester katscher example.... and the upper (third) - to fill it staba. This ADVANCE need to prestrukturiranje average matrices, and as for the hose I have already written the answer somewhere here ....

Forum

Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.

Re: The Stabilizer.