Can do on this issue can say the following. Even I working with devices for more than three months, barely slogging through the data language. There is a saying : "We cannot understand how our word will respond." I believe that a person is absolutely not familiar with Radionomy, this response will lead to a complete not understanding.Маг.нет wrote:The instrument control (wording of intentions) optional target, the Trend is to place on the unit, it is possible the same questions to solve in another way, such a direct formulation using the Transfer-washers.Наталья73 wrote:don't understand
Thus, in the formulation of intent and to better define the target and the Trend (the relationship with these "signs" more "fixed" device).
Sincerely, MAG.no
I have a suggestion to persons seeking on the pages of this forum to conduct educational activities and to share their experiences. Let's respect others and to write more correct language. Let's not literary, but more understandable. What is clear face deep uninova in the subject and familiar with it at the level of "top sense" is not necessarily clear to the beginner. Let's decide - either you "Shine with their knowledge" and are allocated to the branch for "super pros", or write a normal language. Before something to someone to write and explain, put yourself in the place of the questioner. Hearken to the essence of the question. And maybe it makes sense to respond in simple language at the level of twice two, than run to prescribe fasting, the meaning of which is clear may not be a very large number of people. But these people and without this post this information is known.
Good luck to everyone!