sensors Psyleron have like about 30 years of history and is highly protected from "interference" of the environment, sharpened the impact of the consciousness.
Really for that kind of interaction from a person actually answers the subconscious part, i.e. conscious of the message we have to learn to be friends with their two hemispheres. It also allows the subconscious mind to send information to consciousness through a weird interface (ie a long way), based on what the online service for sending messages made by pelerinaj. Esilaranti have a large group of users around the world and somehow, at least in my view and slowly develop.
The main advantage - convenient compact pocket meter. Although I have they are always permanently turned on.
To psyleron is a lot of different software, which was born during the research. Studies were of sufficient mass for engaging students and enthusiasts.
As for the sensors, the diamond is not clear. Written too many years, version 1.0 is similar in price to psyleron looks outdated (DOS, com, or LPT interface), the other relatively more expensive.
Perhaps they are better, maybe the same, maybe more. Don't know - need to learn. Family friend (actually the home institution), but no more.
I can't say anything.
Judging by the fact that sensor 2 is connected to the MIC input, have the same Registrar of the noise that is made either better or worse or the same. Can not know. The software is clearly poorer for the price - more expensive.
For example in the manual on the diamond says that it is sensitive to ismenias the temperature, and psyleron - no, they are for older versions of the device are tested for the influence of external factors (the so-called test биг6).
With "diamond" written that can respond to cell closer than 5 meters, psyleron work well next to other equipment - many times checked, no interference.
But maybe in this case, dimondi reading something more sensitive or something else. You need to look with your own eyes when you get a chance and compare.
put in the list
but there are a lot of points.
In General, thanks for the link, probably need to talk to people, maybe in the course of the conversation and find out something useful.
Overall I think that this is almost the same (similar devices), just Americans with a slightly better financing was made a bit more user-friendly and noise-free design. And maybe Vice versa
I am sure that the diamond will also work well at a distance as psyleron.
I somewhere already wrote above that noisy divider to the input of the microphone this is the simplest psyleron (well in a jar of it in the screen and it will be a prototype of the diamond, well, you can still like psyleron make the filter external frequency generator, and much more.<