recommendation.
until think with[SPAM] or[SPAM], just accept as is.
From the standpoint of the usual us technique a bit not correct all this to perceive and analyze.
Communication, in the information sense, occurs everywhere and always.
For example, the same photograph on the device of Charles, which we have worked, some have not. Actually worked at all (much sure), but all perceive differently. Clean would experiment with GDV GDV before and after, and insulated at this time and TO experiment (or transportation, etc.), and it is difficult to implement.
I.e., the picture associated with the individual... but there are still trees, sun, clouds (for example), what impact will that we put it somewhere on the cloud? Yes way.....
Any artist who creates portrait - creates a connection with a man even more powerful than photos.
Psyleron creates a relationship not with a person but with the process of consciousness, rather impersonal (which by the way is very good), i.e. without creating a reference to the person.
Funny-if the artist will think about a person, but will draw instead the portrait of a straight line, the relationship will arise anyway, because it will work the same property of consciousness, and when exposed to psyleron, recording on the paint signal describing the object about which he thinks.
Here the holographic principle works 100%.
I took a piece of writing, but until its published, felt his job (although I'm certainly sensitive). Yes, it is better not text, and points, but only because the points to fit more into the view, an order of magnitude or two.
There is only a piece of writing, but the response arises with the same object. Depending on the type of the show - the sound, the picture, the picture in the form of spirals, square and so on, is simply a different degree of quality of communication with the "original".
I write about that very thoroughly tested and no doubt due to the clear understanding of theoretical basis and because of a clear understanding of effective practice. Ie don't hesitate, just accept that it works. Believe me, I actually do not care. At best I get a bonus if someone something useful from software write that we didn't get the worst just make sure that useful knowledge does not lay in one, and even closed the basket. In other words I do not have much meaning to post, but since then went to a theme, then keep it all in the bosom think is not correct.
Again, the ones and zeros from the device value chip hologram, are displaying a whole. Debris there is not prevents this and you need to filter, since these are processes of a different order.
It's not invented yesterday, and for a long time and is well-tested on significant numbers of people.
It's just a tool.
I gave a working technology, it can be used as is and does not need to be finished, no need to come up with a technological point of view that there is not, because our consciousness is not correctly assesses similar processes, all analogies from ordinary life and technology are not relevant here, trust me.<
