It's a question You probably asked yourself, because they do not understand the essence of the discussed technological trends. The fact that YOU cling to the small details, trying to get everyone to side confirms Your personal lack of interest in that deal.Пчёл wrote:If You do not see the obvious technical/design details/decisions(albeit ancient Smile), then in General about any CO(and other smart stuff) and samples with You can you lead a discussion? Very Happy
Probably opinion will not change, so as to carry out the experiments You will not.Пчёл wrote:my opinion will change dramatically after the experiments in boiler and honda civiс with the engine 1.4.
We're talking about a systematic approach to restoring the structural relations and on the practical results of the application of this approach. Ekonorm only one of the devices of this series. The main objective of Ekonorma - increase of traffic safety. Available statistics shows a decline of the probability of the insured event (accident) by approximately 40%. The damage from the accidents is reduced even more. Reduction of accidents is due to the fact that the driver adapts better to changing road sitatsii and makes the fewest mistakes.
However, we understand that each driver to test this statement is not possible. Therefore, we propose to verify Ekonorma to measure their cars. Such parameters are many, but the most informative are the reduction of fuel consumption 5% to 30% and reduced exhaust emissions (for petrol cars the rates of co and CH, for diesel measure of smoke).
Fuel consumption is difficult to measure due to the variability of flow regimes. It is usually controlled integrally, over a long period of time. First, some months I go without Ekonorma and calculate the average consumption, then a few months after installation (preferably the year before and the year after, to remove the influence of seasonal factors).
Exhaust emissions control is easier if you have a gas analyzer. Here you can meet in a few days. But there are some features. New cars with good catalyst to see the change of toxicity is almost impossible. At the exit of the pipe will be zero both before and after. Good results show of old cars (especially our, Russian). They change WITH can reach several times (up to 10-15 times, for example from 1.5% to 0.1%).
Once again, measurements of parameters of vehicles is not a goal but a way to verify Ekonomov. Enough of the effect of our research, in order to use most. Especially the doubters can experiment. But by the financial results the increase in security does not go to any comparison with the fuel economy. Calculate how much a car costs and repairs after an accident, add to this the cost of the lives of passengers (or the costs of a possible treatment after an accident) and You realize that fuel economy and cost Ekonorma a trifle.<