Ахим wrote:fashion version of a Parlor giving a new, unknown possibilities
Even if these versions are electronic, they are still attached to something. That is, we have your source, let Energy.
Ахим wrote:s he touched it with the Mirror of ISIS.
So what? I touched one on one. I and one electronic version.
And are you suggesting the interaction of one electronic version, with thousands or more people. Processes. And pull this one version? Will not subside? Or will pull up the rest?
Ахим wrote:unknown possibilities
That's it! Just do not give electronic versions and we don't know all the features of the electronic version, and want them to experiment, and in a big way, globally!
I have noticed one simple thing. It is the users cheap versions, the most daring experimenters. The same with money.
Sunday met with a friend, haven't seen a month and a half. Drinking coffee, talking. I know that he is trying to negotiate for the sale of some object in the centre of the city (I'm on spring touched this topic, but after talking half an hour with a representative of the seller, threw the theme out of my head, because of the complete inadequacy of the proposals, but nevertheless, I'm always interested in the continuation of the cases to which I at least sometimes had an attitude), asked how things are going there, and they are generally?
Friend replied that the negotiations for a peaceful walk, but no result. Price is not fused. The seller gives 20% less than the client wants. Precise prices. And say that there are only three acres of land, well, plus unique construction. But that would lead to the desired quality land is scarce. Therefore, the uniqueness of the object, does not outweigh the small size of the land. And therefore the asking price is simply inadequate.
Friend gives the answer, which I quietly, starting to slide off the chair.
"but think of it, the buyer adds to the purchase price of 70 million more dollars, will cover the area between the two piers, will increase the area for another three hectares, and everything will be fine!"
Before me sits a man in army pants, with a soldier's belt, zastiranny t-shirt, gray, and whose labour at the moment there are several hundred rubles in his pocket, he easily manages tens of millions of dollars of other people's money. Well at least virtually. But knowing him, he and these other people's money would have done so.
It is impossible to dispose so easily of the products, whose operation is, the basics of their interaction with the surrounding world we do not know.
My opinion of these products can be used only on the principle:
"ONE PRODUCT - ONE USER!"
It seems that hell really doesn't like to Chamber. So they want to squander.
On the one hand.
On the other hand. You ever here realize that it is impossible to climb to the other people with actions, something in their life changes,
WITHOUT the consent of THESE PEOPLE?<