Тапка wrote:OPA !!! Eureka!!! It made me understand!!!
Sincerely, MAG.no
And I heard of a control group of patients with cancer of people who were given "new medicine" ( placebo really ) and some of them entered remission. The human brain is unique and has not been investigated so far. If you believe that you have such results from exposure of the generator to some energy take it .. well, for example in MIPT . Let examine.) but something tells me that such studies have already been....МерКаБа wrote:For organogelators. If someone had told me a year ago that iron sponges, epoxy and crystal with Mobius, you get this powerful device, I would say: Yes, you are putting me on! But after made it myself, was convinced that in this world, generally nothing to be surprised.
Маг.нет wrote:for observations used the "blind" method, the user did not know, not only what it is, but he has it. I've seen the result of similar trends with her. And the plants where they know what it could be placebo? Or my dog? Or the inner circle, on which the impact was produced only from contact with me?
To prove I do not know how, and why? And to show... here is a suggestion:Математик wrote:I can't explain the action of these generators. As long as any of you do not prove the existence of orgone energy. It is very difficult to explain the action non-existent.
Практик wrote:And that's about orgone stuff(which very much even not bad) and any kind of scientific validity does not pretend(yet) to doubt why it is necessary to try and order yourself a test and make a conclusion on YOUR EXPERIENCE
Again... I don't care who buys, in what quantities and for what money. What drives and how to choose the products, I don't care either. My question is to the buyers. I'm not at liberty to disturb you to do what you think is right.Тапка wrote:OPA !!! Eureka!!! It made me understand!!!
There are people who before buying the same chamber ( and other devices) are studying the reviews,digging the Internet, and asked to PROVIDE a CONCLUSION, at least some official bodies, and through scientific ( within fundamental conservative science) .
There are people who read the reviews ,they like - they buy yuzayut and make sure the claimed effect( positive) - and they don't need sanitary reports ,they are so happy))) .
There are people ( very inquisitive and smart), who also read the reviews did some digging online and trying to build themselves data devices - they have all ATLICHNA and it turns out they don't need reports and science ( although the fact that they did it already quite another science,the more advanced) .
Nothing to argue all right tell(we have similar thoughts)But in this situation irritates me that there perepletaetsya science. open site *** and read the section of Technology. there is a lot of scientific terms, references to any "scientists" and so on.
Super! So we need electronics in order to assemble a box with two boards and wire in the socket? Now what I'd do... call... well, for example Hyperventilator perfect waves. Buy a thousand for $ 20?Тапка wrote: For me science is the electronics which you can use to create our thingies , the rest of the conservative science of little interest to me .
Think about it - why spend nerves,forces,and time to explain from the point of view of science such as organogelator or lucid dreaming ,the outputs of the body????
Not pleasant to use devices and get the pleasure and benefits and exciting experiences to put ???
A little off topic of the Parlor like BAA......
Yeah nah, that's right!!! I would even say this is "key" to successI believe in dreams and miracles)) is dangerous - I know))
The beginning of this debate coincided with the beginning of my next journey, so I will connect to discussion failed, hope now slowly we uncover.Математик wrote:my God.. my eyes bleed when I read it...
ASD wrote(a):
Those who are trying to understand is the most intelligent. We welcome them and help you understand. But to give an explanation and reasonable and logical and rational at the same time, this is really difficult
.
Give at least one. Your choice.
In Your statement already contains a logical error. I'm not talking about the objectivity of irrational perception. It's Your assumption. It comes from Your perception of my words. A logical explanation for that, which contains internal links, consistent assumptions. But everyone defines assumptions. This is a subjective choice, so the rational explanation is subjective. However irrational the explanation is also subjective.Математик wrote:So if you can't ( not surprisingly ) to describe the wonders that make these cards using the logic describe with physics. I don't mind.
Open the definition of the word Irrationalism and you will be pleasantly surprised. 99% of what I saw on that site is irrational. Recall ratio - reason)
ASD wrote(a):
Therefore, the rational perception - is subjective.
And this is all nonsense. Based on this statements and following the LOGIC, it turns out that irrational perception objectively. If there was a conversation about logic..
rational and always logical. And irrational there is no logic. In this and You can't explain, how work of your plastic cards. Because there is no rational and logical explanation. And the only plastic card that can affect a person's life - it's a credit card in his pocket.
What You something in life not doing so, it is logical and we can accept this statement. But about panacea - again, this is Your subjective statement, we wrote about it. We wrote about specific properties of the devices and the studies supporting their performance.Математик wrote:And then I realized. Something in life I'm doing wrong.... There is a panacea for all ills. And is inexpensive. For three dollars give card. It can and coke cutting on the road and life will be saved.
I think that this is not "blind".Маг.нет wrote:for observations used the "blind" method, the user did not know, not only what it is, but he has it. I've seen the result of similar trends with her. And the plants where they know what it could be placebo? Or my dog? Or the inner circle, on which the impact was produced only from contact with me?
Placebo (from the Latin verse. Placebo Domino in regione vivorum, in Church Slavonic translation Blogowogo before the Lord in the land of the living, PS. 114:9) — a substance with no apparent medicinal properties, used as a medicine, the therapeutic effect associated with the faith of the patient in the efficacy of the drug. Sometimes a capsule or pill placebo is called the dummy. As a substance for a placebo is often used lactose.
In addition, the term placebo effect is called the phenomenon of improved human health due to the fact that he believes in the effectiveness of a certain influence, in fact, neutral. In addition to taking the drug so the effects can be, for example, some treatments or exercises a direct effect which is not observed. The degree of manifestation of the placebo effect depends on the suggestibility of the person and external circumstances "treatment" — for example, the size and bright colors of pills, the degree of confidence in the doctor, the credibility of the clinic.
Finally had the opportunity to respond to the forum curious. While it may not be inquisitive and curious. Depends on what they like more - to know or to torture.Математик wrote:Bother me a bit more. I've been walking around the forum, and just in an Internet rummaged. I have a question for the Minister of culture Sergei Dinamico.
I went to the site infraconstruction.ru and carefully study what is written there in the sections of Technology and Scientific Concept. Let's start with technology.
1. Article about water. I do not know for whom it was written, but agree that the physics are there to understand something very difficult. And what is interesting.. take your description of what kind of physicist Wolfgang Ludwig ( personally, I don't know about it ) conducted some research, which concluded that even after full chemical cleaning and double distillation in water is information about the molecules those elements that were before cleaning.
People not familiar with physics would say "so what" ?
But the fact that if this really physicist proved that water has memory, he would have received a million dollars from the Fund James Randi as a prize. Somehow, the premium is still not received..
A very emotional reaction to our hypothesis. It is certainly possible for us to descend to display reciprocal incorrectness - type fermions - particles with half-integer spin (1/2, 3/2, etc.) and not just 1/2. However, we are talking about something else. You don't like our theories. Fine, suggest. Explain the effects achieved with the same attitude that You understand. Indeed, in the same criticized the text the following are the results of experimental studies. Or is it You don't care. It is important to only Your misunderstanding.Математик wrote:Agricultural program: I forced myself to finish it to the phrase : "Either the electrons must change their spin, or needs to be replaced with molecules that and in that and in other case will require additional energy and time"
Then the head passed out, because I cannot imagine how quantum mechanics ( and the notion of spin from quantum mechanics, a notion that is not explained by the principles of classical and relativistic mechanics, even ) were able to drag the agricultural program. here is the truth... Explain to me.
And again. What electrons have, and most importantly can change its spin? And by the way the Pauli principle does not speak about the electron. and all the... fermions whose spin is 1/2.
Here You have us stumped. Both from the point of view of classical physics can describe these processes? Maybe You still need in terms of caloric? Or what do You mean by classical physics?Математик wrote:move to автомобилямSmile
then do not say how the device Ehkonorm lowers WITH SN, reduces fuel consumption and increases engine power. You can at least briefly? From the point of view of physics. Classic.
About reducing emissions - from the point of view of chemistry.. I'm not a chemist, but ask friends to tell).
About reducing insurance claims and other mystical shit - not necessarily. I am only interested in what you can touch and prove.
That You are right, the cause of all ills in man. We just wrote about this. Because the sleeping consciousness of the person and that he is trying to scientifically justify their destructive activities. And pathogenic information and does not allow him to begin to demonstrate its reasonableness. Our products allow you to reduce this pathogenic influence of the environment and to enhance their reasonableness and quality of decisions.Математик wrote:Go to scientific concepts.
I read your article titled
"CIVILIZATIONAL CRISIS AS A RESULT OF THE LOSS OF MEANING OF THE SLEEPING MIND"
The main point of the article, well, at least that I understand, is to ensure that all the troubles of the human is to blame classic science. That running out of oil and gas, the fact that pharmacology invents a ton of drugs, and diseases do not become less, man-made race destroys the planet, etc. and people are not to blame.. Since there is some pathogenic information that does not allow him to think properly.
I somehow want to believe that we have the science subservient to the man, not Vice versa. The cause of all human misery and suffering first and foremost in the person, and not a pathogenic environment.
Any scientific description is not complete. It has its own internal constraints. And it should be remembered always, when considering any scientific theory or concept. Very often in science, we are dealing with the approach of discarding facts that do not fit the theory.Математик wrote:But I want to ask.. If particle physics is just information noise, what can You offer in return?
The science we love. It is a scientific approach allows us to move forward and create new devices and technologies. But we do not like the dogmatism and narrow-mindedness in science. Don't like prejudice and bureaucracy in science.Математик wrote:You don't like science. And she, apparently, doesn't like you.
We respect the scientific activities of Grabovoi, although we do not share some of its approaches. So we look at the scientific work and not on shortcuts.<Математик wrote:Oh yeah.. after I read rave reviews about Mobster... and I saw his name in the list of references.. that much was clear.
This is the approach of the believer. That is, he does not need explanation. If said works, then that's enough. I guess the key here is "a ritual dance with a tambourine". Then I believe that this is so.Математик wrote:If the creators of this miracle said something like: "gentlemen. We have created a unique device. It will greatly enhance your standard of living and generally you will have a lot of nishtyakov! How does it work? we don't know. To create it we use the fine shit of a young rhinoceros, which we stuffed in the card on the 17th of every month at exactly 2am. After this dance a ritual dance with a tambourine. We don't know why or how, but it works!!!!"
if the explanation was this - I wouldn't have any complaints. But the technology to create these devices are trying to explain from the point of view of science. Well, or at least by using big words that nobody understands.
Nonsense - this is for You, as You have been taught that time is one-dimensional. There are, however, other theories in which time has more dimensions (some up to 6). In particular the theory of physical structures is also does not impose restrictions on the number of time dimensions. Therefore, we can speak about the dimension of time and its density and other parameters.Математик wrote:I have a half day today, read the forum and I have occasional hysterical fits...
I've read here of message one of the company employees: "As I understand the action of the chamber benefits,this increase in the dimension of time that is raising the event.Due to the dense stream of events ahead,including in the search for new directions of earnings"
THE DIMENSION OF TIME?!?!?! you have not mixed up?) maybe time is now the axis on which one can determine the "dimensionality"??
But people read it and don't even realize how crazy that sounds) But I agree... it sounds nice.
There are torsion concept Akimov, Shipov theory is, there is microleptinae hypothesis Katrina, there are a number airodynamics hypotheses, etc. They are created in order to explain a number neobychnyh the results of experiments in the framework of conventional physical concepts cannot be explained. For example, at the time the log reports of the Academy of Sciences published the Katrina experiment on the effect of a rotating body on a beam of light. All the critics of these theories, defending the purity of science as a rule find any inconsistencies in the theories and completely ignore the experimental material. This is the result of "sleeping consciousness." Offer objasnienia Katinski, Akimov and other phenomena, then criticize the theory. And while there is no explanation, nothing and mouth open.Математик wrote:And this... about torsion fields - much. To science, they have the same attitude as I have to fly into space. At least in the sense in which used in this forum.
Read the materials of our sites carefully. No tantrums and seizures.Математик wrote:No report I have ever seen. I mean the reports with the technical documentation
This means that You are badly taught. Quantum mechanics as part of physics, and explains many phenomenon (though not all). For example, a chemical process or processes in computers. Biochemical processes in living organisms are also trying to describe from the standpoint of quantum mechanics.Математик wrote:I here for example do not understand how quantum mechanics can be used to improve yield.