Decided to post an article,I think it is exciting news Fraud on our health. The information storage of water.
Excerpt from the letter: Hello, Alex!
Your statement:
"So, let's make the first conclusion: any "information water memory" does not exist and can not exist"
My rebuttal:
Academician Speransky, S. V. in a series of experiments with water proved that water not only stores information, but also understands flushed spoken.
This experiment in great detail was shown in the TV-scientific and educational channel program "Rambler".
Bye!
Answer: It's a lot of letters, whose authors somehow claim that the information memory of water exists.
It seems to me that the authors of these letters do not understand one obvious thing. If there was an information memory of water - it would be a real disaster for all mankind.
Let's for a moment imagine that the information memory of water exists.
Imagine yourself as a young enthusiastic homeopath takes a tiny fraction of the active substance and begins to prepare a homeopathic solution, diluting and diluting the starting material with water.
In homeopathy it is believed that the more diluted with water the original substance, the more properties of such a solution. So, if we can get to the bucket of water was only 1 molecule of the original substance - it is considered bad breeding. Such a remedy will have to take frequently - every hour.
If 1 molecule of the substance have 100 tanks of water is more suitable solution - the medicine can be taken less frequently - a few times a day.
If 1 molecule of the substance accounts for all the world's oceans that is a homeopathic solution. It can be taken once a week, but the cost of such a solution is quite high.
So, suppose that we have agreed with the theory of homeopathy believe that water has information memory and can remember information about the molecule of the initial substance, and information is stored by changing the structure of water.
However, immediately the question arises.
It is obvious that in order to obtain a solution of water with the desired memory (i.e. a solution with a certain structure), we must use a special water - water from which before there was no memory of any substances.
It must be brand new, just created water!
It should be water that has never touched any substance!
It must be a water near which was not a single person (you don't have to man his sinful thoughts or words affect the information storage of water)!
And if the homeopath takes for breeding ordinary clean water from an artesian well, the water has already passed through the earth, it is already in contact with hundreds of chemical elements, memorize their information structure.
If the water was stored in the bottle, that it is in contact with glass particles of matter, which was treated with a bottle, with particles in the air, particles of dust deposited on the surface of the water, etc.
But is a young enthusiastic homeopath thinks about this?
No, of course.
He takes the water and thus believed that water up to this point didn't remember anything, and then will remember.
Ie homeopathy is based on double standards.
The same substance is attributed to the complete lack of memory (water up to the introduction of her homeopathic substances means not remembering anything about those substances, which in contact earlier), the superplate (after the homeopath has introduced into the water, and then through numerous dilutions brought out of the water the original substance, the water supposedly can last 10 years to store information about a substance, which when touched).
Moreover, homeopaths ascribe to water a tendency to remember not all the input substance, but only the part that is needed and beneficial to the homeopaths.
The fact that the majority of drugs (more precisely all except the minerals) homeopaths first diluted in alcohol, and then these alcohol solutions are beginning to dilute with water. Thus, strictly speaking, homeopathic solutions need to remember information like the medicinal substance and the alcohol.
But for some reason homeopaths prefer to alcohol to forget. Likely to believe that alcohol is water memory is not enough.
So here we come to a contradiction.
If water really has information memory, she remembers everything, she remembers how the children swam and peed in the water or even podmilj your dirty ass. After that, the water of all the oceans (we all know that homeopathy considers the ideal dilution of 1 molecule of the substance on the whole ocean) needs to change its structure and acquire properties of urine and feces.
The river washed away the old graveyard, the water all of the oceans must acquire the properties of the cadaveric poison.
The river swam fish infected with the worm, the water all of the oceans must acquire the taste and properties of tapeworm.
All of this is completely absurd.
If water really could remember the information, it would be the greatest calamity for humanity. Because this water can't drink - she would remember and dirty pipes, and millions of scandals and family squabbles, and the decaying remains of humans and animals and more than touched and by what tech.
Still, how fortunate that the water just doesn't remember it. And we can, without thinking about the past water, boil kotenochek a Cup of tea and calm his drink, admiring the sunset over the sea.
We can skip drinking water using a common household filter, remove the water from the extraneous chemical substances, boil the filtered water to the soup and not to think with horror about the fact, by which the water ran over the past years and what Marzocchi seen.
Thus, once we recognize that drinking water isn't a poison (and it is certainly not, otherwise we just couldn't live), then we must recognize that there is no "memory" of water there.
But the idea of "water memory" has many advocates who claim that "information memory of water" proved by science.
Almost all the articles dedicated to the "memory of water" is taken to refer to the dissertation of Stanislav Valentinovich Zenin "Structured state of water as a basis for management behaviour and safety of living systems".
This thesis for the degree of doctor of biological Sciences he defended in 1999.
The essence of the thesis in the following.
S. V. Zenin suggested GIPOTEZU about the existence in water some stable associations. So, according to the hypothesis, S. V. Zenin, water represents the correct hierarchy of the bulk structures, which are based on crystal-like "quantum water", consisting of 57 molecules.
These "quanta of water" can interact with each other at the expense of free hydrogen bonds, sticking out of the tops of the "quantum" their faces. While it is theoretically possible education structures of the second order.
According to the model Zenina interaction of structures with each other could THEORETICALLY lead to the emergence of structures of higher order, which COULD, according to his CALCULATIONS, to consist of 912 molecules of water.
But, I stress that this is just a mathematical calculation one of the models. At the moment there is no practical confirmation of this model was not found, because modern devices do not allow to commit the structure of water.
Maybe it's some new word in science? Maybe Zenin the first who suggested some structured water?
The answer to these questions can be found in the journal "Biophysics". This is a purely academic journal frequently publishes articles on the structures of water, talks about how there are studies and experiences on this, built a model of the structural state of water.
However, anything to do with memory of water, nor with the information field of water, these studies have not. So, from the article by Yakovenko and co-authors, working in Pushchino (A. A. Yakovenko, V. A. Yashin, A. E. Kovalev, E. E. Fesenko. "On the structure of the vibrational spectra of water absorption in the visible range" Biophysics. 2002. T. 47. No 6. S. 965 – 969), it becomes clear that the very idea about the structural condition of the water, nothing unexpected for the scientists there. After all, any substance with dipole molecules will have a particular structure. But for a detailed study of these structures of modern physical devices are not suitable. Too unreliable result.
Simply put, at this stage of the development of science, we can build any model of the structural state of water, but check them practically that is not possible.
Here on the calculations of one of these unverifiable theoretical models S. V. Zenin thesis.
But in addition to the model Zenina there are other theoretical models which are the same almost yet can not be verified. Why around a purely theoretical model Zenina inflated hype, and why say that he had proven the "memory of water" is beyond me.
Defenders of the "memory of water" often refer to the book of Japanese researcher Masaru Emoto "the Message from water" (2005), "The secret life of water" (2006).
The essence of the Emoto experiments as follows: the Water in the bottle is placed between two speakers from which the sound is normal for a person volume.
The sound selected is different - the music is Beethoven, then Chopin, then heavy rock, then speak words of love or curses, etc.
After that, the water from the bottles is poured into Petri dishes and frozen at the temperature of 20 degree for 3 hours.
Further nuggets of ice are placed under the microscope, and the author observes, on the surface of the ice crystals formed figures in the form of snowflakes, or other fancy pictures.
Moreover, according to the author, classical music, a pleasant gentle words, words of "God", "angel", etc. - lead to beautiful pictures of the snowflakes and curses, the rock, the word "devil," "Adolf Hitler," etc. - bad picture.
Well, let this miracle will understand.
To begin with, it was well known that no one snowflake (frozen drop of water) never same as another - they are all different. Therefore, it does not matter what kind of them to include music and words to every time we get his own, unique image of a snowflake. There are beautiful options and not very pretty, and just ugly.
So we can't take one of snowflakes and say - here it is, the answer to the thought "I love you", but this snowflake is a response to the abuse mate.
By the way, Japanese "researcher" Masaru Emoto (born in 1943) the results of their work in the scientific press does not publish (and it is a requirement for a person who considers himself a scientist).
Moreover, he has no special natural science education. He graduated from the municipal University in Yokohama, majoring in "International relations", and some time later in 1992 he received a certificate of a doctor of alternative medicine of the Open international University of alternative medicine in Kolkata (India).
The requirements for obtaining a doctoral degree at this University a minimum of one year of training, the publication of five articles and a contribution of US $ 350.
Those wishing to learn about the biography of Masaru Emoto more I refer to the English version of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masaru_Emoto . Here he is in the category of "Pseudoscientists" (pseudo-scientists) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pseudoscientists)
Despite the fact that results of "research" is outside the scope of science, it did not prevent Emoto to do a successful business. The samples of the products his company I. H. M. and prices can be found on the website Hado.net. This, for example, a small bottle of water at a price of $ 35: "Indigo Water Geometrically perfect water with the Message of your body".
Honestly, when I saw it and was amazed... the Bottle is geometrically correct of water per 1 thousand. Bender would bite their elbows...
But the work of Masaru Emoto more than just business. The challenge for the next 10 years is to increase the number of angels on the Earth who will resist the demons. On his Russian-language website (http://www.masaru-emoto.net/russian/rusdiary200602.html) Masaru Emoto writes (spelling and punctuation preserved):
"Still, if the information will be able to move freely, perhaps even the existence of the greatest negative forces, which consisted in a conspiracy to exploit this situation for their benefit.
Therefore, despite the development of new technologies, what matters most is the balance of people who use this technology. In other words, talking about the balance between the number of the angels against the demons.
Dr. Higa, known in their technology EAT taught me once that 10% of bacteria are negative, 10% positive and the remaining 80% are opportunists.
So if there is just only 1% more of the negative bacteria inside us, the remaining 80% will become negative and can complete a heavy disease.
Since I believe in the law of similarity, I think that this example can be used and for the human society.
So, if we can insure that 10% of the population of humanity the likeness of the angels, can bring a lot of peace full of love and gratitude.
The present world population is approximately 6.5 billion. 10% is 650 million.
This idea is the basis of my Declaration made in United Nations, may 26 of last year, that I intend to issue 650 million copies of the book "the Message of Water" in the children's variance.
Until then, published 10.000 copies as a sample, which we distribute around the world. I hope in 10 years there will be more angels than demons on this earth."
That is, to put it mildly, not very scientific.
By the way, there on this page Masaru gives recommendations on how to disperse the clouds... Well, what else to take with the doctor of alternative medicine... fights against demons, disperse clouds, spreading ideas about "Hado"...
It should be noted that Emoto Masaru attaches great importance to the concept of "Hado".
"Hado" in Japanese means "vibration, subtle forms of energy."
Without going into further details, we summarize: on the basis of pseudoscientific speculation Emoto Masaru actively creates new planetary religious movement, a religion Hado. He does not forget himself, actively promoting and selling their own products - bottles with the "right" water books on water, pictures of water, songs of water, carafes of water, etc.
I think of Masaru Emoto and his "messages of water" and its a business we understand.
And as for any statements of my fellow employee of the Novosibirsk Institute of Hygiene Sergei Vladimirovich Speransky (corresponding member Q. International Academy of energy information Sciences, i.e. pseudoacademic of pseudoacademic of parapsychology), it has long been known for its "experiments" with the "torsion fields" (physics confirms the presence of such fields, and he is experimenting, and creates devices that produce torsion fields).
However, in torsion fields S. V. Speransky did not stop. He is now engaged in a test of psychic abilities of healers, confident in the existence of telepathic abilities in white mice (on them, he checks the ability of the healers), invented the instrument for the harmonization of family relations (on the basis of torsion radiation, of course), well, and gives advice on how to remove the evil eye, etc.
Honestly, seriously talking about these things and about any "alternative" statements S. V. Speransky I do not want.
By the way, as illustrations of the latest articles about homeopathy, I want to publish one letter.
It is the opinion of the physicians that use homeopathic medicines in their work. Feedback is valuable because it shows us a glimpse of the man responsible for the lives of others, and therefore not prone to adventures and unnecessary risk.
Letter: Hello, dear Alex.
I'm a medical oncologist, candidate of medical Sciences.
More than two (and maybe more than three, don't remember) years with pleasure and benefit for many patients are a subscriber. With pleasure, because I like to work efficiently. With benefit for patients, because Your information helps a little to organize the known data and it is then easier to correctly give the patients a General recommendation.
I do not blindly trust You, and read critically. A couple of times already wrote to You. Once You have agreed with me and corrected himself. Other times You convincingly proved me right that was also nice - like objectivity.
So. About homeopathy, I want to say my opinion.
There are scientifically based purpose. What does it mean?
Science is when data is confirmed by scientific experiment. Scientific research is when data obtained by one scientist, easily reproducible by other researchers.
For example, when operable breast cancer if performed after the operation of full chemotherapy, the five-year disease-free survival of about 80%; without chemotherapy - the five-year disease-free survival of 15-20%. This is the science.
Any researcher will get similar figures.
Homeopathy is irrelevant to a scientific experiment has not. When getting a homeopath a result, it is not reproducible by other researchers.
If homeopathic appointment does not help, the "expert" said that was not taken into account, for example, the color of feces or something like that. To consider everything impossible. "It did not help, because..."
And if the problem goes away (tempus vulnera sanat - time cures wounds), then the homeopaths take the credit for it. Then you can find a lot of nuances to explain why you helped me because of some trifles. What kind of doctor is good, all considered!
Here is my approach. Homeopathy is prescribed when sure that the problem is not serious and would heal on its own, and the patient's a coward without any appointments will be nervous. For calm it is necessary to perform rituals, such as busy, the doctor prescribed...
Can weed occasionally, better homeopathy. Pharmacy, where manufacturers paid a fine who should, and could good manual to write.
And acquire, among other things, the image of the doctor-innovator, a supporter (when necessary and possible) harmless treatment. Sold the dummy and helps beautifully written manual. According to your faith let it be...
I'm not a whiner-negative, but successfully working and, by the way, normally earning the doctor. But You, Alex, to write useful things, and I want to be useful to You. Even though You do not share my views, but an extra opinion won't hurt You.
All the best!
Sincerely, Oleg Viktorovich
Comment: Thank you Oleg for your letter. I completely with them agree. Homeopathy can (and sometimes should) be used, but only for psychological support of the patient. Ie as guaranteed harmless placebo.<
). 
