Svetlitsa Blaga. The results of the application

Post by **Андрей Кабанков** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:21

Guest
In your favorite theory of probability is the probability that the monkey planted per print machinko random keystrokes write War and Peace.
Now imagine that you were on this point.Here is the miracle.
I have long been convinced that in life can happen anything you like ,any miracles.And all of this would not contradict the theory of probability.We just get to the segment of the cases.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:52

Andrey Kabanov

your beloved of the theory of probability is the probability that the monkey planted per print machinko random keystrokes write War and Peace

not my favorite but it's scientifically proven the axiom ... my and your attitude towards the theory of probability does not cancel the evidence of its adequacy .
and the probability that the monkey accidentally stuffed semantic text

I understand why you believe in the parlor

now imagine you were on this point.Here is the miracle.
I have long been convinced that in life can happen anything you like ,any miracles.And all of this would not contradict the theory of probability.We just get to the segment of the cases.

you can fantasize and need ... what is the connection with a simple experiment with a coin ? I'm not asking you to get a monkey to write war and peace !!!!!!!!!!! I just suggested a very primitive and simple experiment with a coin ... and all the time you go around a simple theoretical examples and let in the fog and trying to explain the impossibility of a simple experiment that is impossible is absurd but if we see a monkey stuffed randomly war and peace we realize that Svetlitsa possible

you have a strange argument ... replacement confirm new assumption with the inability to check ...

check out a simple experiment with a coin ...

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:17

Dimas wrote:Guest
Nope, tossed and "dropped" on the floor,to giving a rotation with a click of the thumb

then hurry to repeat , prolong loss of eagles in several series , and zadokumentirovat ... this will be the most effective proof and I'll buy a room and people will advise

and then all your justifications and vague and unsubstantiated allegations on the basis of questionable data ...

Dimas · Post by **Dimas** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:41

Guest
Will definitely repeat for my own satisfaction. And to prove to You I'm not going to, thank you...Why? I'm not interested.
PY.Sy.
In my opinion You picked a few losing position in terms of finding the truth for You. Provocation works sometimes, but only in those cases when the opponent has the emotional charge and desire to broadcast their point of view and when there is something "pull".To pull us not for that (of course there is,but in another sense I am

) In our case, we are ready to share their experience and thoughts about this product, but don't want to impose anything on anyone and prove foaming at the mouth. For myself, I had already decided on through the drawing rooms, in my PERSONAL opinion it works. Of course, you might not trust my words, since I am busy in this project, but more can not offer, but to read, to listen and be a little bit open, leading the dialogue in a more constructive way.
hmm..questionable data..well, I agree... and whether all the information which You appeal undeniable?

Сержэ · Post by **Сержэ** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:48

Andrey Kabanov

From gold.
I can scale more suitable.
Examples relate to business and represent business information.

Andrew, at least schematically it may have sounded.

For example, signed a contract or have successfully completed the negotiations, which obviously was a failure.
Or, sales grew from a certain position 2 times.
Or, there are a wholesale buyer, which was "hunted" for the last 8 years

Or...

What positive changes happened in the business (without prevedenia specific commercial. information - which refers to "closed")

В нашем случае, мы готовы

Dimas

be Sure to repeat for their own interest. And to prove to You I'm not going to, thank you...Why? I'm not interested.

strange , where does my personality for me ... you don't need to prove it !!! you've been a parlor ... the site is laid out experiments FOR WHOM ? ... add your EXPERIENCE TO THEM !!!

moreover, it is very evident and not those of mnogabukav which the ordinary reader and purchaser, and do not understand ... or is it that you need ?

Provocation works sometimes, but only in those cases when the opponent has the emotional charge and desire to broadcast their point of view and when there is something "pull".to pull Us not for that

we have to name the issues interesuyuschihsya provocation and shout at him ....
seditious I write ? the problem with questions is also a provocation ... and awkward question triple ?

and that the transition to the emotions in your words to PULL ? read this quote and it seems that you put the topic on emotions and it can supply to the provocation ?

In our case, we are ready to share their experience and thoughts about this product, but don't want to impose anything on anyone and prove foaming at the mouth.

what kind of foam ? emotions ? I read your thoughts and experience and analyze that with the fact that I ask a question ? maybe you are mistaken for the gold all that shines ... as said solnushko

I've already decided on through the drawing rooms, in my PERSONAL opinion it works. Of course, you might not trust my words, since I am busy in this project, but more can not offer, but to read, to listen and be a little bit open, leading the dialogue in a more constructive way.
hmm..questionable data..well - I agree... and whether all the information which You appeal undeniable?

there is a method of understanding a new cook in that environment and to listen to those people and the MAIN thing is NOT to LOSE MIND AND ADEQUATE ... what I do ... and this is not a provocation but an attempt to understand and your answer goes to the Treasury for further review at the nuggets of truth and how familiar it will show further developments ...<

Dimas · Post by **Dimas** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:59

In our case, we are ready
Hmm..apparently You not very get the idea.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 13:23

Dimas wrote:In our case, we are ready
Hmm..apparently You not very get the idea.

so please explain ... I explain ... and so it's just emotions ... they say it can you ...

Dimas · Post by **Dimas** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 13:28

Guest
Try reading my post again, delving into the meaning, and not wanting to play this game and load their own conjectures each my offer. Understand it will be hard the first times, as I understand this is Your usual style of dialogue. "Hard to exercise-easy on the job.."

Солнышко :-) · Post by **Солнышко :-)** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 14:00

In our case, we are ready

В нашем случае, мы готовы wrote:can you mistaken for gold all that shines ... as said solnushko Smile

I was in the discussion.

In our case, we are ready can I ask you a question: are you in what area you work, what do you do? If You are not too personal a question, please write.
This question I ask because the profession has a certain effect on the world model of a particular person.

оуаакун · Post by **оуаакун** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 15:58

About my proposal, which Andrew Kabankov ignored. It appeared out of the blue.
I told about the SS one my friend (not a poor man, now travelling the world) He kind of asks, it is a device of some kind, you know how to use it, etc.
And I say, there is no device - a circle of plastic in the plug is not necessary to include, just on the neck to wear.
He asked and gallop is?
I - 3740 R.
He GALLOP??!!

Yeah... Thing is not cheap... I think...

And about Good - he won't buy EVER. Because he already has a variety of benefits, i.e., for fear that if it really works - it can break the existing balance, which he is quite happy.
Here.

Post by **Андрей Кабанков** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 20:04

Guest
Strange that you don't know what I want to say about probability theory.Make strange conclusions from what I wrote.All asking me to throw the coin and throw a series of eagles 100 times in a row.
Will have to chew.
Svetlitsa,I think,will not cause the coin to fall a certain way.The coin will fall independently of it.Just might so that when a coin falls out an eagle,you just need.
All nagoricino,the chain of events are diverse.Enough in the chain of events that nearly pushed to the side and the final will be quite different.
Do not cycle on the coin,life is much more complicated.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 23:28

Dimas wrote:Guest
Try reading my post again, delving into the meaning, and not wanting to play this game and load their own conjectures each my offer. Understand it will be hard the first times, as I understand this is Your usual style of dialogue. "Hard to exercise-easy on the job.."

I have read and commented on my reading ... and you read my answer and try to understand visitor ... if you invite to your site ... and prokomentirujte what you do not understand and what makes you think that I did not understand you ? your emotion and feeling is possible I do not understand but the meaning you wrote is obvious - to label guest ... supposedly we are not to understand, and so forth ...

and those with no justification of the phrase exposes the appanent supposedly stupid and uncomprehending to leave to fans of the faith ... better prokomentirujte what and where I have misunderstood and explain what and where your accusations have justification in my posts ....

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 23:31

Sun

the question I ask because the profession has a certain effect on the world model of a particular person.
Friends

models of the world mass ... but I am for an adequate model , and you ?

Солнышко :-) · Post by **Солнышко :-)** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 23:38

Guest
Tell me what is your assessment of the degree of adequacy of the model of the world? Precisely how do you assess its value? On what parameters?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 0:05

Andrey Kabanov

Strange that you don't know what I want to say about probability theory.Make strange conclusions from what I wrote.All asking me to throw the coin and throw a series of eagles 100 times in a row.
Will have to chew.

no you got it wrong ...
you claimed that our world is small and the number of repetitions and sometimes all it takes is one chance !!! to citatet nebudu do remember ...
so I suggested to split this category into small segments which you say and try them on will make the room turn the event you desired te for example from 3 times to throw the eagle !!! and then another one too, eagle and so on and if you now perform we will see 100 segments of three times and all-or 70 percent of the EAGLES !!!!!!!!!!!!
BUT THIS WILL NOT HAPPEN !!!!!
and you continue to reproach me that I supposedly offered to throw 300 times and wait for a single case

noooo ... I suggest to throw twice and then two more in every situation to rely on the strength of a chamber ... that is you can't confirm by experience ...

and do not use words such as I raszhevyvat ... thought at first and maybe you are not until the end understand myself and my responses to you ? I'm always willing to explain ...

the front room,I think,will not cause the coin to fall a certain way.The coin will fall independently of it.Just might so that when a coin falls out an eagle,you just need.

te you say that the coins will fall like anything and let 50 50 ... but now is not a coin and manage themselves, and be in the right place at the right time ?

it is generally unrealistic as they do not the situation is built for you and you are looking for the situation ... that is, not the eagle you need then and when you and the eagle ? he decides ? and if you change to tails that he is looking for a head ?

well ... you business men and you need the permanent loss of an eagle to exceed minus tails over plus eagle ... you throw a coin and it falls 50 50 ... you are at zero !!!!! you will not be able to manage the process ? war ... strelyayut constantly ... also can't stop bullets ..
playing at the casino ... won what ? ACCIDENTS ONCE ALL FULL ...

All nagoricino,the chain of events are diverse.Enough in the chain of events that nearly pushed to the side and the final will be quite different.
Do not cycle on the coin,life is much more complicated.

Moreover, life is more complicated than coins, and if you can't coin to manage that much about life to say ?
you insist on the recognition of accidents of the work chamber ... or saying that will always be missing in the band tails and appear in the band eagles ? t e you limited ... t in the life of the bands and weight of bricks and crashes and coins and ice on the road and etc ... you will have forever to sit at home and wait for the stripes eagle will match all events ...
you are saying that do not manage the coin and be in the positive lane and its 50 us 50 and they had not all the same ...<

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 0:10

Солнышко :-) wrote:Guest
Tell me what is your assessment of the degree of adequacy of the model of the world? Precisely how do you assess its value? On what parameters?

not I appreciate the peace I seek adequately to perceive it ... that is, not to invent any nonexistent ...
the adequacy of this desire for the most accurate description of the world picture or situation in your head its real manifestation, not to overthink this one ....
t e the more real you can understand what's going on that you adequate ...and that you are stronger because I understand cause and effect and can influence them or to avoid

Солнышко :-) · Post by **Солнышко :-)** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 0:54

Guest

Гость wrote:not me appreciate the peace I seek adequately to perceive it ...
the adequacy of this desire for the most accurate description of the world picture or situation in your head its real manifestation, not to overthink this one ....

I think you chose a too limited model of the world that does not allow you to perceive other participants of the forum. It is an interesting fact.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:04

Солнышко :-) wrote:Guest
Гость wrote:not me appreciate the peace I seek adequately to perceive it ...
the adequacy of this desire for the most accurate description of the world picture or situation in your head its real manifestation, not to overthink this one ....
I think you chose a too limited model of the world that does not allow you to perceive other participants of the forum. It is an interesting fact.

what is this nonsense ?
I didn't choose the model of the world ... I'm trying to really understand where I am and what's around ... and I understand even the schizophrenic that I know that he is sick and why it behaves and even after reading about schizophrenia predicts his behavior and present his feelings

adequate man can understand any t K adequacy is the maximum according to your understanding of the real situation ...

here's an example of you in your post is simply labeled as you WANT that you were right ... and it is inadequate and you are unable to understand others ... you only see their desires and are reluctant to see the real info on the sight and waiting for a verbal confirmation of your desire and the facts you do not understand that to them contrary to the wishes

explain why I have you chosen a too limited model of the world that does not allow you to perceive other participants of the forum. and what is the fact ? in your desire or the facts ?

it try to justify to yourself your approval this will be your first step to adequate and insight ... and understanding of people and life ...

Штиль · Post by **Штиль** » Thu Aug 13, 2009 0:36

оуаакун wrote:
He asked and gallop is?
I - 3740 R.
He GALLOP??!! Yeah... Thing is not cheap... I think...

Well what about the Good gold didn't tell him

Гость 3 · Post by **Гость 3** » Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:50

Yoohoo - Where are you? On the other end?

Instead desaty time you download an updated database to antivirus and stabbed in poker, the man decided to show everyone how to use logic to try to cast doubt on any vyskazanymi the idea of the interlocutor, for some reason, you are at once opponent.
Do you want to surrender and be transferred along with the eagles tails, and a description of adequacy, as deistvennyi tool for understanding OCD. the world in some thread a separate topic, like "My refutation of the validity of a parlor or Sutlery. My scientific counter-concept" or, simply, but with taste "Evening conversations with guest padosan". Or have to give up all reading this thread...

And why?
The answer is simple and it lies right at the top of this page. So. Everyone held their breath... Let's raise our eyes up and ... and what do we see? Dum-dum: "subject: Svetlitsa-Blaga. the results of the application. !!!

For mnogosloinoi foam of someone else's ideas , thoughts, and perevireni read, understood concepts individually and all other things, which are everywhere, I'm sorry of course, but in BULK, a little important not opustilas of mind - and in fact, the REASON and PURPOSE for which was created this Eurovegas! For me I interpret the reason as: "the owners all the best of the world, unite" and the goal "unite ... in order to properly explain some events from the point of view (ONE OF the POSSIBLE, of course)on them as modulirovannye with SOME degree of participation in it is Good." How to do it? To work out examples using the collective experience of the owners of the card, and then when mapping and objectification : the ability to make any conclusions, and perhaps find some patterns in the course of events. on the basis of the identification of these patterns, it is possible to trace some General trends in the course of events with the participation cards have different owners, which in turn can address some skepticism regarding its work (that is to say, that as a bonus, in order to reduce the proportion of meaningless and purposeless in the discussion) and , most importantly, knowing some identified aspects of its interaction with humans in the future to use it more effectively. And what we will leave to descendants? After us first polzujushijsja so to speak, "modern achievements of science and technology"? Piles of useless flooding from a series "to Itself the Director" and "University challenge"?
Asked verbal to practice in another topic. And here: Results. Of good and bad. The subjective and objective. Utilitarian and useless. Benefits.<

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:05

Guest 3
as well as to make sure that the user ascribes to the effect of svetlice other factors ?

offer anything you write as a work of svetlice to take at face value ?

Yes you are correct ... and you can clarify it and you wrote the owner of svetlice ... and on you ?

in fact the theme : Svetlitsa Blaga. The results of the application !!!! not pulling the ears of any event as a result of the application !!!!

here we are trying to understand what is written by the owners is what and what is not ...

or you suggest not to play this game written by the owners and take their word for it ... maybe they are describing illogical conclusions try to compromise the parlor ... people have long already do not believe the reviews like I bought and everything was cool ... it will convince only the very gullible people ... you offer to arrange a club gullible ?

Post by **Андрей Кабанков** » Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:40

Guest
Really create the theme of "Svetlitsa. My scientific counter-concept".
It is the right offer,it'll carry quotes from other topics and comment on them there.Anyone interested in worship.
And then all themes have overwhelmed your reasoning,vaguely related to the topic.Your position has long understood.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:50

Andrey Kabanov
okay ... I'm going ... well, sometimes we can che will ask ... thanks for the responses and tolerance , the parlor will not buy , not convinced ...
and good luck to everyone in your

Post by **Андрей Кабанков** » Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:53

Guest
But why leave,you are an active participant of the forum.To communicate with you I wonder just would like to do this without overflowing the themes of our arguments.