Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 19:11
Going forward
Mmm,thank you very much and high astenik is good?
Mmm,thank you very much and high astenik is good?
Dim sum, duck here and set - flame (and glasses - this is secondary), so I'm no one to face off, and have fun (a ZHSL, I believe, learning), as in other places of the forum is not appropriate (all such I recently tried to clean).Dimas wrote:Andrei Patrushev
well, I think so too...the main thing that absolutely it is a futile exercise IMHO...just want I was all octoberville if there is a desire to have one,if so I tidbit in the new year days and we finally finished to be measured by buoys,to pour manure, and entered into a more constructive direction about the video glasses,if it's someone interesting
Well what is Robespierre, you ChoИдущая вперед wrote:Dimas
you don Quixote or Robespierre...most likely.... to define a type in socionics just need to run some tests which take a long time....you astenik.... melancholic with small admixtures of hot-headed (not sure - haven't really talked in person) I have for example with alternate success that Dreiser, Dostoevsky gets a very good site for соционикеhttp://tests.psychotype.EN/3/res/
Go you to the bath with their tests... no test will determine your sociotype. Because people often do not agree with he called sociotype immediately, but only after two weeks...Идущая вперед wrote:and to test yourself and determine your psycho here - if all 3 test matches it means точкуhttp://tests.psychotype.EN/
Every woman wants to be DrajzeraI have this time coincided all 3 tests.... I Dreiser-the guardian... long suspected... ethical-sensory introvert...
http://junona.org/modules.php?name=Socionics
So, socionics you don't know, otherwise I would have long abandoned all other classifications, like the athlete, astenik, endomorph-ectomorph.Dimas you high asthenic... in socionics in appearance, you can define a psycho..
I wonder how it will make Mr. Patrushev Still for the words to respond, the more professional he considers himself.Dimas wrote:ZHSL
Eheheh..!
Let's here to finish this conversation,otherwise me at times and calm down.Harm ,as I understand it, I will bring,but at the same time view You are right or not and what I can do,OK?in short,I agree to the procedure
There the business logic. People encouraging result and action, not soplezhuystvoАндрей Патрушев wrote:it's All good for the game or for a quick but rough assessment of the main trends in the conditions of limited time. No wonder so fond of socionics human resources managers in small businesses (which cannot afford to maintain good psychological service).
+1ЖСЛ wrote:socionics, much better than any of psychology defines the person what he does in life never admits what any psychologist in him will not see
hyhyИдущая вперед wrote:mlyayayayayaya... you shouldn't
Ha Ha HaИдущая вперед wrote:ZHSL
what are you so angry and everyone comes over???
life failed??? says Mr. Patrushev need to be kinder to people....and you are brutalized and new year's showdown then fouled mlyayayayayaya... you shouldn't
Yeah! Got it Drajzera type, Oh, I can not Women listen, so they are all Grazers But if it turns out not to be Drajzera, it is Dostoevsky at worstЗОМБИ wrote:hyhyИдущая вперед wrote:mlyayayayayaya... you shouldn't
Nothing lit up, absolutely You're doing this on purpose.ЗОМБИ wrote:ZHSL
Dear ZHSL, could you and me otherout. Judging by my posts on the forum...
Photos will not leave the phone does not give all men with..key ("Women's League").
You go to the typing group of socionics.Андрей Патрушев wrote:Science is always a high degree of reproducibility, with different "operators". I was also at different periods of life socionic experts tested in different ways: Bitter - Napoleon - Dreiser - Yesenin. And each of them, ZHSL, beat yourself heel in the chest and spreads his fingers and claimed that he is the coolest...
Duck it, just because everything I think about myself, and the result of that one at all - continuous profanation...ЖСЛ wrote:You go to the typing group of socionics.Андрей Патрушев wrote:Science is always a high degree of reproducibility, with different "operators". I was also at different periods of life socionic experts tested in different ways: Bitter - Napoleon - Dreiser - Yesenin. And each of them, ZHSL, beat yourself heel in the chest and spreads his fingers and claimed that he is the coolest...
And people, pick up inches any science - pond-pond, who can argue?
You're trying to pull a similar pattern at me, I'm still that person. And recognize only solid experience
And this is after I Jclu explained that it's silly, stupid and not professional...ЖСЛ wrote:Dimas wrote(a):
ZHSL
Eheheh..!
Let's here to finish this conversation,otherwise me at times and calm down.Harm ,as I understand it, I will bring,but at the same time view You are right or not and what I can do,OK?in short,I agree to the procedure
I wonder how it will make Mr. Patrushev still for the words to respond, the more professional he considers himself.
I'll stay on your opinion - people with EXPERIENCE(rather than a set of inches and bloated CDA) socionics - Dimas octoberwith at timesАндрей Патрушев wrote:And this is after I Jclu explained that it's silly, stupid and not professional...ЖСЛ wrote:Dimas wrote(a):
ZHSL
Eheheh..!
Let's here to finish this conversation,otherwise me at times and calm down.Harm ,as I understand it, I will bring,but at the same time view You are right or not and what I can do,OK?in short,I agree to the procedure
I wonder how it will make Mr. Patrushev still for the words to respond, the more professional he considers himself.
What do I do now? And perezdat you, Professor?ЖСЛ wrote:Anyways nezachot, Mr. Patrushev.
Thank You, Andrew.Андрей Патрушев wrote:Okay - about personality dichotomy I'll tell You (if sagacite ). First let Chukchi anything weakne (his lordly privilege ).
Yesterday I spent the night in a female student dormitory I'm so on the drum all this garbageЧукча wrote: ZHSLI specifically wrote to you - read the dictionary and think about yourself, what you've written so far. If even such a basic action you overload, then so be it - here's an article from the dictionary:
"Consistent separation of the whole with the further division of of each part another two, etc.; a form of classification in which concepts, terminology, sets are broken down on a pair of interacting elements (subclasses, subsets, etc.)".
You have a very limited and inflexible way of thinking, if you are not familiar with linguistics at an intuitive level. Hampered by the limitations of Living?Чукча wrote:I actually do not care about your socionics (maybe there is such a division), but "logical dichotomy" is "butter oil", and "socionic dichotomy" - it's like if some socionics washed my ass in the river, and then said, "Oh! It is now socionic river!"
As a guard?yesterday I slept over at a female student dormitory