ЖСЛ wrote:Quote:
With the dichotomy You really made a blunder (am I making any sense?) - just look in the dictionary (and socionic dichotomy is even more absurd phrase)...
I just told you - that you are a layman in socionics.
launched Yandex.
Socionics in St. Petersburg - Lytov D. Psychologists and socionics: what is the dialogue?
Similarly, by approximate equal – emerged and the dichotomy of Amikino "rationality – sensation" (we will remind, in its opinion, it is intended to replace the socionics dichotomy of "logic – ethics").
Okay - about personality dichotomy I'll tell You (if sagacite
). First let Chukchi anything weakne (his lordly privilege
).
And what about "is it possible the dialogue between socionics and psychology?", perhaps we should speak.
Psychologists use personality typing there and then, where and when it is appropriate and beneficial. Socionics (and would have sounded better: "azionisti"
) shoved their socionics anywhere, elevating it to the rank of a great (almost religious) teachings.
Psychologists believe that human personality and individuality - the essence of the dynamic, constantly changing in a constantly changing world and even more - depending on the context. Socionics reduce the human to the mechanistic notions of the 16 psychological types (even on 32 - from the Chicago school) glued to the individuals for life. However, they can not even imagine the physiological bases that underlie these psychological types.
Psychologists with desire and diligence, there are no problems in the study of socionics. From socionic, in most cases, even thought there is that socionics is not the ultimate truth, and that in addition to these 16 definitions it would be useful to examine other related science.
Of course, there are always exceptions... Here You are, ZHSL, for example, claim a great role in the history... Stop repeating like a parrot (I mean a parrot
) other people's stupidity and start finally to think - You will...
Nowadays, all the great discoveries are made at the junction of Sciences.
<