ЖСЛ wrote:Андрей Патрушев wrote:Yes, You yourself wrote that you consume. And no matter who You wrinkle "a drug Addict" or "junkie" - the essence is the same (see above). Now I believe my experience in this matter (by the way, I suspect that I have it commensurate with the time of Your life).
And you can link where am I using?
Club drugs - used almost every fully-fledged young man. What do you mean full? Successful in life socially.
Your colleagues from different countries, seeking legalization for therapeutic purposes, because of their huge effectiveness for the treatment of people with mental problems. And you know it. In the United States was allowed, as experience yet.
Further - they are clearly divided into two groups: those who thrill to the music in the clubs and those who are alone, in a dark room, working on myself(by the way, the effect in this case, of course, completely different, no one experiences any euphoria). The result of interest to you? Or will be considered for the promotion?
Psychos they treat, but with healthy people - guess what they do?
Do not dissemble! You know that all Your posts about Your drinking, I deleted because of the propaganda You drug...
No need to ship us the myths propagated in the environment of drug addicts and junkies the same. On this forum and children come...
Yes, I know that attempts were made to treat the mentally ill people of various drugs, but I also know that there is no "huge efficiency" at all, but there is some cases of spontaneous remission that even clearly ascribed to the result of drug use is not possible. But the opposite effect - emotional problems as a result of drug use (to a lesser extent, this applies to products and Your amphetamines) recorded by the clinicians effectively. However, I can not use the rumors and myths with freaky sites, and literature and, imagine, even, are co-closed reference pabia "Classification of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. Caused by psychological effects and consequences of use."
I was on a business trip in the US in Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) - Federal Agency to combat drug trafficking. So, for the last 10 years, the United States has tightened laws to combat drugs. And if earlier there has been debate regarding the legalization of marijuana for therapeutic purposes, it is now no longer maintained. By the way this debate was lobbied not therapists, and magnates, in relation to the manufacture of paper and fabrics as obtained from hemp paper is much better quality than wood and thus a resource that renews each year. In Holland, where he tried to go the way of legalizing "light" drugs, received in the end a real social catastrophe associated with the birth and labor now employed (if not already done) of the law, significantly tightening control over drugs.
Also ask You to stop verbiage regarding the definition of drug and causes of addiction. This is also the standard tricks sellers of drugs, designed for immature children and teenagers. Each country has approved by law the lists of illegal and legal (but very strictly controlled) drugs, and these lists are "written in blood" of millions of simpletons who have bought into the standard stories of drug pushers that "if you're okay with the psyche, that habituation does not occur and, if pricked, de in the mind, not increasing the dose, it is possible to catch a buzz and even benefit from this to (another standard myth that small doses of the drug improves the mental and creative abilities). I believe that the availability of drugs is one of the main problems of the development of drug abuse in any country. And, incidentally, to the development of drug addiction in Russia has made concrete efforts "are our constant friends". In Yekaterinburg, in the years of Yeltsin's rule, not once was detained representatives of foreign intelligence services, specifically working on the creation of a network of drug trafficking.
Now, regarding Your logic. Your statement about the necessary and sufficient communication for the success of young people and their use of club drugs from the point of view of logic very similar to the expression: "the Wind is blowing from the trees sway". I would argue that in each case a specific person is successful in a certain activity due to the various qualities and circumstances, but always contrary to taking drugs.
And Your example is poor "yoga" and especially Your explanation on this issue do not stand up to scrutiny.
Thus, I consider this discussion closed and all further posts on this topic will simply be deleted. If You haven't quenched his desire to shoot the breeze about the usefulness of drugs, then You still have to look for another forum
.<
The question is, will he have time to understand what it all around trying to say or not... 
Now he has a standard phase, when the health is still there, plus the euphoria from the drugs. In this phase, usually no amount of persuasion do not work, no logic. Even death or injury of friends who started early, too, do not apply. Every addict somehow thinks he's not like all he dose will not increase and so stupid and not die. Hence demogogiya these and links to their own experiences and posturing. In this phase, addicts make very high opinion of himself - all the rest is a muddle and conduits empty slogans (the exception is that for members of the group, which together consume). In General, consciousness is already fully subordinated to the drugs and only works to justify use.
