The Program Of Andrey Patrushev Raduga

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Mon Mar 16, 2009 22:11

Паскаль wrote:and if you listen to 2 times a day
it turns out the 10.5 days?

Thank you )
No, the same 21. :)

User avatar
Дмитрий В.
Posts:191
Joined:Sat Nov 29, 2008 19:01
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by Дмитрий В. » Sun Mar 22, 2009 21:13

if you have the opportunity to listen to 2 times a day
it is better to see the same 21 days/ 42 times
or
one set of afirmaci in the morning 21 day
another set of afirmaci night?
or
better 1 time a day, one set

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:57

Паскаль wrote:if you have the opportunity to listen to 2 times a day
it is better to see the same 21 days/ 42 times
or
one set of afirmaci in the morning 21 day
another set of afirmaci night?
or
better 1 time a day, one set
The goal is one, and affirmations can be countless...

Ляля

Post by Ляля » Mon Mar 23, 2009 19:01

Just found this app. Very positive, thank you.
The stars move very nicely - I like it. After 10 minutes I was able to get out of my head all the phrases, and if you look at both the Kama Sutra embossed look, the speed of movement of stars and the appearance of the phrases varies (although this is probably only the speed of perception). Complete relaxation. I love it. Thanks again =)

Ант

Post by Ант » Mon Mar 23, 2009 20:55

polazil on the Internet, practically everywhere write that the method of the 25th frame is not working, it is admitted even by its Creator, who to believe? who ever felt the real effect of the program?

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Mon Mar 23, 2009 21:52

Ант wrote:I climb on the Internet, practically everywhere write that the method of the 25th frame is not working, it is admitted even by its Creator, who to believe? who ever felt the real effect of the program?
Go to Gzone in the relevant topic - it contains links to research about how the method works. Think about it - who benefits argue that the method is not working...

Ант

Post by Ант » Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:00

thank you, very interesting article, but as I understand these technologies work in a very complex and individual, and those elementary programs, which can now be downloaded online, and apparently rainbow including, it turns out that useless?

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:51

Ант wrote:thanks, very interesting article, but as I understand these technologies work in a very complex and individual, and those elementary programs, which can now be downloaded online, and apparently rainbow including, it turns out that useless?
"The world is as simple as possible, but not simpler..." (Einstein)
"All that hard - it's not true..." (frying Pan)
:) :) :)
Rainbow-arc is fully customizable by me and works very effectively. :?

Guest

Post by Guest » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:17

Андрей Патрушев wrote: ask yourself - who benefits argue that the method is not working...
Media and advertising people - especially... which drive us through the frame 25 about the fact that condoms are much more effective than without the wings
and still a lot vesca and imposed programs - which is absolutely necessary...
in the subconscious laid the foundations of what you can spend money (product) and what not
so that's item number 1 and the rest are so-so and still plenty of techniques for influencing the subconscious mind
NLP in this respect (anchoring binding reflection) and some were not on the effectiveness of 25 the frame

Ант

Post by Ант » Tue Mar 24, 2009 19:10

Probably looking for something to use. English probably this method of learning is not as effective because one must then remember consciously what you have loaded in yourself 25ым the scenes, but all sorts of suggestion which are there in the subconscious, and should remain so reach is better

User avatar
Логик
Posts:2073
Joined:Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:43
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Логик » Tue Mar 24, 2009 21:07

Guest wrote:media and advertising people - especially... which drive us through the frame 25 about the fact that condoms are much more effective than without the wings
again started someone 25огокадрофобия. Looks like the journalists were inspired. Or maybe just spring fever...

Недоушелец

Post by Недоушелец » Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:39

Andrew,
When will the new version of the Rainbow in order with angloyazychnoi operationkey to use?
Thank you

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Thu Mar 26, 2009 14:02

Ант wrote:Probably depends on what you want to use. English probably this method of learning is not as effective because one must then remember consciously what you have loaded in yourself 25ым the scenes, but all sorts of suggestion which are there in the subconscious, and should remain so reach is better
English should be taught systematically, but the vocabulary in this way - very effectively (to know yourself), because the conscious activation occurs during reading and conversation. Of course, if English is nowhere to apply, it is the use of this method - zero.

Смотрящий в даль

Post by Смотрящий в даль » Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:07

Hello, tell, please, and Sedona-phrase so it is necessary to edit or you can leave just as there is in the first place?mean will it be difficult for the subconscious to digest this amount of antiaffirmative as is the case with affirmations?

Is it possible to combine Sedona-phrases with affermazioni?and where better in Your opinion to put them: Sedona-phrase in the center, and affirmatsii at the edges or Vice versa?

When I use affirmatsii in the settings the path names must be removed?
Thank You in advance for your answers

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:48

Смотрящий в даль wrote:Hello, tell, please, and Sedona-phrase so it is necessary to edit or you can leave just as there is in the first place?mean will it be difficult for the subconscious to digest this amount of antiaffirmative as is the case with affirmations?

Is it possible to combine Sedona-phrases with affermazioni?and where better in Your opinion to put them: Sedona-phrase in the center, and affirmatsii at the edges or Vice versa?

When I use affirmatsii in the settings the path names must be removed?
Thank You in advance for your answers
Do as you see best for You. :)
Please explain your last question.

Елена Ф
Posts:9
Joined:Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:10

Good afternoon.

Post by Елена Ф » Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:51

Thank you for the programme and for answers in the forum.

What binaural frequency is most effective when you work with affirmations?
If I understand correctly is that of the theta range?

And what should be the carrier frequency for the binaural effect?

Thank you

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Re: Good day.

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Tue Mar 31, 2009 16:37

Елена Ф wrote:thank you for the programme and for answers in the forum.

What binaural frequency is most effective when you work with affirmations?
If I understand correctly is that of the theta range?

And what should be the carrier frequency for the binaural effect?

Thank you
In the "Articles" section in my Handbook, I hope You will find satisfactory answers. :)

Guest

Post by Guest » Tue Mar 31, 2009 17:35

Андрей Патрушев wrote:
Смотрящий в даль wrote: Do as you see best for You. :)
Please explain your last question.
1) how do I know what is best for me? :oops: trial?
2) Afformance begins with the question Why... and affirmation from my name...when you use affirmatsii whether in program settings, put a tick in the "names"?
Thank you

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Wed Apr 01, 2009 15:25

Anonymous wrote:
Андрей Патрушев wrote:
Смотрящий в даль wrote: Do as you believe it is better for You. :)
Please explain your last question.
1) how do I know what is best for me? :oops: trial?
2) Afformance begins with the question Why... and affirmation from my name...when you use affirmatsii whether in program settings, put a tick in the "names"?
Thank you
1. "Do as you see best for You" (A. Patrushev) :)
2. It does not matter. :)

Guest

Post by Guest » Sat Apr 04, 2009 19:56

Andrew, as you mentioned that the affirmation should work on it to kick in. But my opinion is, that not every affirmation we can say for sure that she started to act. Based on his own experience of prepinaniya NLP, when I was taking the brightness from negative memories, and found that the technique deistvuet, only three months after he applied it, and the memory of the traumatic situation the whole time didn't disturb me. I'm referring to the fact that the brain filters out repetitive information, I ask how many days in a row to turn one affirmation(affirmatio). Does the law 15 15.

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Sat Apr 04, 2009 20:50

Anonymous wrote:Andrew, you both have mentioned that the affirmation should work on it to kick in. But my opinion is, that not every affirmation we can say for sure that she started to act. Based on his own experience of prepinaniya NLP, when I was taking the brightness from negative memories, and found that the technique deistvuet, only three months after he applied it, and the memory of the traumatic situation the whole time didn't disturb me. I'm referring to the fact that the brain filters out repetitive information, I ask how many days in a row to turn one affirmation(affirmatio). Does the law 15 15.
This law is always in effect. :) By and large, about the time You are right. :)

АлександрБ

Post by АлександрБ » Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:46

Good health!
Very interesting to learn Your opinion, as a person to understand, the program fast programming of positive thinking offer(mysuccesscreator.com), how it is environmentally friendly and safe for the subconscious? the effectiveness of the technologies?:
- Mineralnoe relaxation, - Modelnoe implementation, Planirovanie plants, the Differentiation of speed modes, - Background harmonization.
"The combination of these technologies allows to achieve repetition of positive affirmations More than a Million times per hour (recommended) listen to".
How could this have happened after some time on the brain?

User avatar
Логик
Posts:2073
Joined:Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:43
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Логик » Sun Apr 05, 2009 13:30

АлександрБ wrote:- Mineralnoe relaxation, - Modelnoe implementation, Planirovanie plants, the Differentiation of speed modes, - Background harmonization.
How clever words! Marketers did not come up with otherwise. The combination of these technologies allows you to achieve FINANCIAL well-being the author of this verbiage!

Guest

Post by Guest » Mon Apr 06, 2009 15:14

here training one looked.... how to reach the subconscious
1. with the subconscious need to be treated as a small child
2. warm and affectionately
3. to position itself as an ACTIVE LEADER
4. the subconscious often sends us clues in the form of VISUAL IMAGES OR BODILY SENSATIONS as we have them ignoriruet and perceived
5. in dialogue with podsoznanie in any case not to use particle NEEEEE (is a truism)
going forward

Андрей Патрушев
Автор сайта
Posts:10238
Joined:Tue May 30, 2006 20:17
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Post by Андрей Патрушев » Mon Apr 06, 2009 20:09

АлександрБ wrote:Good health!
Very interesting to learn Your opinion, as a person to understand, the program fast programming of positive thinking offer(mysuccesscreator.com), how it is environmentally friendly and safe for the subconscious? the effectiveness of the technologies?:
- Mineralnoe relaxation, - Modelnoe implementation, Planirovanie plants, the Differentiation of speed modes, - Background harmonization.
"The combination of these technologies allows to achieve repetition of positive affirmations More than a Million times per hour (recommended) listen to".
How could this have happened after some time on the brain?
It is completely safe and effective - in addition to music there's nothing there, all the rest is Your intention, regularity and faith. Beautiful words and a price - to strengthen the third. :)

Post Reply